Search for: "Rico Johnson v. State" Results 21 - 40 of 119
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Sep 2013, 10:00 am by Venkat
Johnson County CCSending Politically Charged Emails Does Not Support Disturbing the Peace Conviction -- State v. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 4:14 pm by Lyle Denniston
United States — Retroactivity of the Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 5:47 am by Amy Howe
Alejandro Garcia Padilla blasted a legal opinion on his island’s political status that the Obama administration filed” in Puerto Rico v. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 6:41 am by Charles Johnson
Houston Criminal Lawyer Charles Johnson provides a strong defense to conspiracy charges at both the state and federal level. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 8:06 am by Max Kennerly
The Amended Complaint was just dismissed, with leave to amend against Johnson & Johnson and McNeil. [read post]
6 May 2019, 12:05 pm by John Elwood
United States, 18-6859, and Santos v. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 1:50 pm by Bexis
Nov. 8, 2012), primarily concerning its fraudulent joinder holding – in accord with the “overwhelming weight of authority” in other states – that a hospital cannot be strictly liable for claimed defects in drugs and medical devices that are used in medical procedures within its walls. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 2:58 am by Walter Olson
Wortman] “Seventh Circuit Curtails RICO Application to Third-Party Payor Off-Label Suits” [Stephen McConnell, D&DL] “Here Is Why The False Claims Act Is An ‘Awkward Vehicle’ In Pharma Cases” [Steven Boranian] Litigation finance moves into car crash business [Denise Johnson, Insurance Journal] Slain NYC sanitation worker’s “frequent advice to Sanitation colleagues about how to save for the future helped persuade the jury that… [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 4:25 am by Howard Friedman
 The court held that double-celling plaintiff with a Muslim cell mate did not amount to state action in violation of 1st Amendment rights.In Johnson v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
  So what follows is our best interpretation of the position of the fifty states (plus DC and Puerto Rico) on whether any presumption arises when a plaintiff claims an inadequate warning (almost every case) that a hypothetical warning (never in fact given) would have been heeded.One thing we have discovered of particular note (at least to us), is that the heeding presumption is an area where the federal courts have run amok, ignoring their obligations under the Erie Doctrine… [read post]