Search for: "Riggs v. Riggs" Results 21 - 40 of 196
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Apr 2020, 8:00 am by Todd Presnell
The Delaware Chancery Court recognized the “fiduciary exception” in Riggs Nat’l Bank of Washington, D.C. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 8:00 am by Todd Presnell
The Delaware Chancery Court recognized the “fiduciary exception” in Riggs Nat’l Bank of Washington, D.C. v. [read post]
4 May 2007, 7:43 am
Students played the roles of jurors, plaintiffs, defendants, defense attorneys and plaintiff attorneys in the case of Kelsey Swanson v. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 3:02 am by Walter Olson
That’s a Terrible Reason for the FDA to Make It Harder to Get” [Mike Riggs, Reason] Expect runs: “Does anyone see the humor/irony here? [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 2:11 pm by Robert Harper
As I wrote in a prior post, dated February 25, 2011, concerning the Estate of Dianne Edwards, the “slayer rule” articulated by the Court of Appeals in Riggs v. [read post]
27 Aug 2017, 2:25 pm by Thomas G. Heintzman
In MT Hojgaard AS v E.ON Climate and Renewables UK Robin Rigg East Ltd & Anor [2017] UKSC 59, the court held that the performance requirement took precedence and that the contractor was liable when the structure failed soon after erection although the structure was built according to the design standard which had an error in it. [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
Brophy Prize    ArticlesThe Hermit and the Boa Constrictor: Jeremy Bentham, Henry Brougham, and the Accessibility of Justice    Chris Riley‘The Great Britain of the South’: the Law of Contract in Early Colonial New Zealand    Warren SwainThe Background to Riggs v. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 3:30 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On appeal from [2015] EWCA Civ 407 The case considered whether a contract for the design and installation of foundations for an offshore windfarm imposed a fitness for purpose obligation on the contractor amounting to a warranty that said foundations would have a service life of 20 years. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 12:39 pm by Lawrence Solum
I argue that, despite appearance, hard cases like Riggs v. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 7:00 am by Spencer L. Reames
 This rule has its genesis in the Court of Appeals decision of Riggs v Palmer, in which the Court stated “[n]o one shall be permitted to profit by his own fraud, or to take advantage of his own wrong, or to found any claim upon his own iniquity, or to acquire property by his own crime” (Riggs v Palmer, 115 NY 506, 511 [1889]). [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 7:54 am
App. 5DCA April 24, 2009): The State maintains, and the dissent agrees, that Fourth Amendment jurisprudence, and Riggs [Riggs v. [read post]