Search for: "Righter v. State" Results 1 - 10 of 10
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
, says: In the same way that Congress did not intend to cabin section 602’s application to copies from countries with a shorter term or compulsory licenses, the legislative record provides no evidence that it intended its application to situations where a trademark owner adds a copyrightable insignia or label on goods to protect against their parallel importation into the United States. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
The Software and Information Industry Association, arguing that “the Copyright Act contains the flexibility to deal with unforeseen applications of section 602″, says: In the same way that Congress did not intend to cabin section 602’s application to copies from countries with a shorter term or compulsory licenses, the legislative record provides no evidence that it intended its application to situations where a trademark owner adds a copyrightable insignia or label on goods… [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 8:43 pm by Steve Gottlieb
The Convention that wrote the Constitution was dominated by nationalists; the states-righters stayed home. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 1:08 pm by Bill Merkel
Hamilton in his Report of the Bank and Marshall in McColloch v. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 4:00 am by Malcolm Mercer
One of the important rationales for self-regulation is the importance of independence from the state. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 5:55 pm
I don't really put much stock in that Canon anyway, since the trial of Bishop Righter. [read post]
9 Nov 2012, 5:31 am
(For contemporary illustrations of this point, see the interpretation recently promulgated by Bishop Mark Lawrence, or the statement of Bishop Shaw on gay marriage in his diocese, or the court's decision in the Dixon v. [read post]