Search for: "Riley v. United States" Results 141 - 160 of 733
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jan 2020, 3:27 am by Nicholas Mosvick
McKenna expanded Muller’s ruling in his opinions in the 1914 case of Riley v. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Decisions about voter list maintenance, one of the most essential bureaucratic duties of state election officials, received intense scrutiny in several states this year. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 1:26 am by INFORRM
United States Talks of a federal privacy law continue in the United States, the New York Times reports. [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 7:38 am by NBlack
For example, the United States Supreme Court addressed the issue of whether law enforcement could obtain historical cell phone records last year in Carpenter v. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 7:00 am by Alysha Stein-Manes
Riley (1989) 488 U.S. 445, 449-450, the Supreme Court of the United States held that “the Fourth Amendment simply does not require the police traveling in the public airways at an altitude of 400 feet to obtain a warrant in order to observe what is visible to the naked eye. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 10:00 am
The phrase was used in 1964 by United States Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart to describe his threshold test for obscenity in Jacobellis v. [read post]
13 May 2019, 6:20 am by Jeff Welty
Jones . . . and regarding cell phone searches incident to arrest in Riley v. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 2:33 am by Patti Waller
E. coliO157:H7 is one of thousands of serotypes Escherichia coli.[1] The combination of letters and numbers in the name of the E. coli O157:H7 refers to the specific antigens (proteins which provoke an antibody response) found on the body and tail or flagellum[2] respectively and distinguish it from other types of E. coli.[3] Most serotypes of E. coli are harmless and live as normal flora in the intestines of healthy humans and animals.[4]  The E. coli bacterium is among the most… [read post]