Search for: "Rimer "
Results 61 - 80
of 102
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2007, 2:42 am
Merpel adds, I always assumed that numbers on sunblock products were an indication of how much sun they blocked ...Sunblock for cats hereSunblock for men hereReal sunblock hereFlashing Badge Co Ltd v Groves (trading as Flashing Badges by Virgo and Virgo Distribution) [2007] EWHC 1372 (Ch) is a decision by Mr Justice Rimer in an interesting copyright/design spat. [read post]
8 May 2011, 7:54 am
Leaving aside the rightness of that decision which we have previously discussed this appeal really turned on the basis of a somewhat throwaway remark made by LJ Rimer near the end of his decision (at para 45) in which he said that in the overwhelming majority of cases the net result will be that the legislation will have achieved its primary objective, that of the due protection of the tenant's deposit. [read post]
8 May 2011, 7:54 am
Leaving aside the rightness of that decision which we have previously discussed this appeal really turned on the basis of a somewhat throwaway remark made by LJ Rimer near the end of his decision (at para 45) in which he said that in the overwhelming majority of cases the net result will be that the legislation will have achieved its primary objective, that of the due protection of the tenant's deposit. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 2:50 am
Refreshingly breaking with the tedious tradition of asking questions so long and convoluted that (i) no ordinary mortal can understand them and (ii) the Court of Justice is tempted to substitute its own questions instead, the judges (Lords Justice Jacob, Hooper and Rimer) posed the following: 1. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 2:38 pm
Rimer LJ found that this was arguable. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 3:27 am
"Lord Justice Rimer and Lord Justice Elias gave consenting judgments. [read post]
5 Jun 2010, 3:43 pm
Its name is Ajinomoto Sweeteners Europe SAS v Asda Stores Ltd [2010] EWCA Civ 609 and it's a ruling of the Court of Appeal for England and Wales (Sedley LJ, Rimer LJ and Sir Scott Baker) last Wednesday, 2 June.Asda (the British embodiment of Walmart) sold its own health food products, some of which were labelled with appealing little phrases like "No hidden nasties" and "No artificial colours or flavours and no aspartame". [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 1:30 am
Hamblen J at first instance concluded that the answers were “yes” and “no” respectively; the Court of Appeal (Richards LJ, with whom Mummery and Rimer LJJ agreed) came to the opposite conclusions. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 8:39 am
Rimer LJ, giving the leading judgment, observed that it was “inconceivable that the draftsman of Note (3) did not have section 26 in front of him”. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 9:29 am
In the Court of Appeal ([2013] EWCA Civ 230) the leading judgment was given by Longmore LJ, with which Rimer LJ and Tomlinson LJ unanimously agreed. [read post]
14 Nov 2009, 1:14 am
Permission was refused on the papers by Rimer LJ and an oral application was refused by Lloyd LJ. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 2:38 pm
Rimer LJ found that this was arguable. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 8:52 am
Court of Appeal Morgan Stanley appealed to the Court of Appeal, where the case was heard by Lord Justice Longmore, Lord Justice Rimer and Lord Justice Tomlinson. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 2:00 am
As Rimer LJ said, “he was not thereby disposing an asset of his, because the money paid was not his” (paragraph 101). [read post]
13 Nov 2010, 6:06 am
The above is the majority decision of the Court of Appeal, and the wording quoted is that of Lord Justice Rimer, who gave the leading judgement. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 2:25 am
Petrodell v Prest appeal to be heard by the Supreme CourtThe Court of Appeal, comprising Lord Justices Thorpe, Rimer and Patten, have given permission to Yasmin Prest to appeal to the Supreme Court against its decision in Petrodell Resources Limited v Prest [2012] EWCA Civ 1395. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 7:50 am
Lord Neuberger’s obiter comments in Holmes-Moorhouse v Richmond-Upon-Thames LBC [2009] UKHL 7 on decisions being capable of surviving an error in reasoning were not relevant.iv) In Lambeth LBC v Johnston [2008] EWCA Civ 690, Rimer LJ emphasised that the right to make further representations was not at the discretion of the reviewing officer, based on the officer’s view of whether the representations would be of any value.v) Camden argued that “a flaw in a decision would… [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 7:50 am
Lord Neuberger’s obiter comments in Holmes-Moorhouse v Richmond-Upon-Thames LBC [2009] UKHL 7 on decisions being capable of surviving an error in reasoning were not relevant.iv) In Lambeth LBC v Johnston [2008] EWCA Civ 690, Rimer LJ emphasised that the right to make further representations was not at the discretion of the reviewing officer, based on the officer’s view of whether the representations would be of any value.v) Camden argued that “a flaw in a decision would… [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 5:51 am
.* Readers may wish to note that Rimer LJ, although concurring with Arden LJ on the result, preferred to reserve his opinion on the implied authority of the MD to commence proceedings. [read post]
2 Feb 2014, 3:30 pm
Etherton LJ, with whom Maurice Kay and Rimer LJJ agreed, did so because it was implicit in any offer of accommodation that the housing authority did consider the questions of suitability and that it was reasonable for the homeless person to accept the offer. [read post]
