Search for: "Rimer v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 35
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Apr 2012, 4:36 pm
Lewisham relied on Simon Brown J (as he was) in R v. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 4:36 pm
Lewisham relied on Simon Brown J (as he was) in R v. [read post]
6 Jun 2010, 2:39 am
A further oddity about the application of a single meaning rule in malicious falsehood cases is that “malice” involves a finding about the defendant’s state of mind. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 3:42 pm
The principles set out in Salomon v Salomon & Co Ltd [1897] A.C. 22 were stated to apply to all jurisdictions and the principles of legal personality had to be respected. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 2:59 am
Giving the leading judgment Lord Carnwath stated that the question was how the element of chance was provided “in the game”. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 4:57 am
It is a conjoined appeal of Universal Estates v Tiensia and Honeysuckle Properties v Fletcher. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 4:57 am
It is a conjoined appeal of Universal Estates v Tiensia and Honeysuckle Properties v Fletcher. [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 2:00 am
This was not, as Colin Rimer made clear, a transfer (actual, or effective) of employees. [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 10:29 pm
For the reasons Rimer LJ has given this is simply not enough. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 8:39 am
Rimer LJ, giving the leading judgment, observed that it was “inconceivable that the draftsman of Note (3) did not have section 26 in front of him”. [read post]
14 Nov 2009, 1:14 am
Permission was refused on the papers by Rimer LJ and an oral application was refused by Lloyd LJ. [read post]
13 Dec 2008, 9:20 pm
Rimer LJ stated that the conclusion of the judge below was that Dr Elithorn acquired no beneficial interest, but remained indebted to the estate for £125,000. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 8:52 am
This was stated as the amount of the participation plus accrued interest up to the Settlement Date. [read post]
2 Feb 2014, 3:30 pm
Solihull Metropolitan Borough Council v Khan [2014] EWCA Civ 41 A rather odd second appeal from a s.204 appeal decision. [read post]
2 Feb 2014, 3:30 pm
Solihull Metropolitan Borough Council v Khan [2014] EWCA Civ 41 A rather odd second appeal from a s.204 appeal decision. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 2:00 pm
As stated by the Florida Supreme Court in the case Safecare Health Corp. v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 10:55 pm
On the Secretary of State’s application, the matter was reconsidered. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 1:30 am
Hamblen J at first instance concluded that the answers were “yes” and “no” respectively; the Court of Appeal (Richards LJ, with whom Mummery and Rimer LJJ agreed) came to the opposite conclusions. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 2:25 am
Petrodell v Prest appeal to be heard by the Supreme CourtThe Court of Appeal, comprising Lord Justices Thorpe, Rimer and Patten, have given permission to Yasmin Prest to appeal to the Supreme Court against its decision in Petrodell Resources Limited v Prest [2012] EWCA Civ 1395. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 7:50 am
If that were the intention, one would have expected it to have been stated expressly. [read post]
