Search for: "Ring v. U. S" Results 1 - 20 of 117
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Mar 2024, 12:10 am by Josh Richman
Ron Wyden and former Congressman Chris Cox in Gonzalez v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
But one thing that is often overlooked in the rush to get out a response is that inauthentic or insincere statements will ring false for everyone, even those that agree with them. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 12:06 pm by Russell Knight
 “[A]n engagement ring is a gift conditional on the subsequent marriage of the parties” Vann v. [read post]
6 May 2022, 6:10 am by Noah J. Phillips
 What is more, the Leegin Court made clear that administrative convenience—part of the justification for administrative rules[30]—cannot in and of itself be sufficient to justify application of the per se rule.[31] The Court’s warnings about per se rules ring just as true for rules that could be promulgated under the Commission’s purported UMC rulemaking authority, which would function just as a per se rule would. [read post]
16 Apr 2022, 2:49 pm by Dennis Crouch
See Note, Subtests of “Nonobviousness”: A Nontechnical Approach to Patent Validity, 112 U. [read post]
6 Apr 2022, 11:26 pm by Orin S. Kerr
This thinking will ring a bell to modern criminal procedure ears:  It's the basic theory of Miranda. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 11:21 am by Josh Blackman
S. ___, ___ (2020) (slip op., at 5) (discussing Ring v. [read post]