Search for: "Rivera v. State of New Mexico" Results 1 - 20 of 22
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Sep 2007, 7:43 pm
The state's use of double hearsay concerning an alleged private search in Denver before the package arrived in New Mexico violated the defendant's right to cross-examine his accusers. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 5:00 am by Beck, et al.
Pa. 1985) (can’t tell what state’s law); Seiden v. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 1:10 pm
CITY OF CRESSON, No. 08-0143 IN RE SCOTT ASHTON, DPM., AND ASHTON PODIATRY ASSOCIATES, P.A., No. 08-0183 TEXAS-NEW MEXICO POWER COMPANY, FIRST CHOICE POWER, INC., AND TEXAS GENERATING CO., L.P. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 2:41 pm
Opinion below (Supreme Court of Kansas) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner's reply Brief amici curiae of New Mexico, et al. [read post]
2 Mar 2022, 2:33 pm
  The United States, as incarnated in its Chief Executive and as articulated in his State of the Union, suggests this process of aging. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
  By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at… [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am by Bexis
General Motors Corp., 575 P.2d 1162, 1168-69 (Cal. 1978); see State Dept. of Health Services v. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 8:56 pm
Opinion below (Supreme Court of Kansas) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner’s reply Brief amici curiae of New Mexico, et al. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 2:47 am
Guadalupe-Rivera, No. 05-1939 Sentence for charges involving drug distribution and firearm violations is affirmed over defendant's contentions that the district court: 1) abused its discretion in refusing to conduct an evidentiary hearing on whether certain prior convictions on which the court based his sentence were actually part of the instant offense; and 2) erred in relying on his confidential juvenile record without disclosing the content of that record to him. [read post]