Search for: "Roads v. Superior Court" Results 181 - 200 of 708
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Nov 2015, 5:15 am by SHG
  The Supreme Court, being as kind as it could to me, provided an answer in its per curiam opinion in Mollenix v. [read post]
9 Feb 2022, 6:06 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” In order to establish liability under section 487, the plaintiff must show that the defendant acted with intent to deceive him or her or the court (see Gillen v McCarron, 126 AD3d 670, 671 [2015]; Cullin v Spiess, 122 AD3d 792, 793 [2014]; Dupree v Voorhees, 102 AD3d 912, 913 [2013]). [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 12:58 pm
  But surely one purpose of an effectively designed tire is similarly to make sure that it doesn't blow out and strand the driver on the side of a road, right? [read post]
18 Apr 2014, 6:34 am by Peter Thompson & Associates
While the trial court denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment, the Superior Court granted it. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 5:36 am by Simon Fodden
An article in today's Globe and Mail reports on a judgment by Ontario Superior Court justice D. [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 9:32 am by Burton A. Padove
In a lawsuit filed in Johnson County Superior Court, the plaintiff asserts there is a history of car accidents along that section of roadway that gave the state’s transportation department actual or constructive knowledge that safety improvements were necessary. [read post]
19 Nov 2022, 11:17 am by Andrew Delaney
Not having any luck to speak of at the superior court level, he appeals. [read post]
18 Oct 2015, 6:33 am by John H Curley
The Court analyzed the case under the test set forth by the Connecticut Supreme Court in Burr Road Operating Company II, LLC v. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 9:04 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Superior Court (Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.) (2012) 210 Cal.App.4th 1006:Under the Elections Code, a city council facing a qualifying citizen sponsored land use initiative measure is precluded from direct adoption of the measure without first complying with CEQA. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 7:33 am by John Jascob
By Anne Sherry, J.D.The Delaware Superior Court determined that parties to a contract denominated in cryptocurrency were entitled to over $25 million in damages. [read post]
26 Aug 2016, 10:40 am by Peter Thompson & Associates
The insurer then filed a motion in the Superior Court asking for a reduction in the damage award. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 8:21 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Replacements (Forbes Cross-Post) Telephone Consumer Protection Act Case Update – Summer 2013 Edition Telephone Consumer Protection Act Case Update – February 2013 Edition California Supreme Court: Retail Privacy Statute Doesn’t Apply to Download Transactions – Apple v Superior Court (Krescent) Court: Customer Consents to Receive Texts by Providing Phone Number to Pharmacy – Pinkard v. [read post]