Search for: "Robert Chang" Results 21 - 40 of 19,668
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Apr 2024, 9:30 pm by ernst
Reva Siegel, Yale Law School, has posted The "Levels of Generality" Game, or "History and Tradition" as the Right’s Living Constitution, which is forthcoming in the Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy:Why does the Roberts Court appeal to history and tradition as reason to change the law? [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Roberts also was among several justices who suggested the case might have to be sent back to lower courts before any trial could begin. [read post]
Working for JURIST has supplemented my legal education, pulling me outside of my law school building and into real-world legal change. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 3:16 pm by Mark Walsh
Roberts was implicitly recognizing that the recent changes have led to some pretty lengthy argument sessions. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 2:35 pm by Amy Howe
Representing Trump, John Sauer told the justices that without presidential immunity from criminal charges, the “presidency as we know it” will be changed. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 12:29 pm by Holly
Your Trademark File Reveals Sensitive Business Information in a Coexistence or Sale Agreement   Trademark owners sometimes must submit proof that the owner of a senior registered mark has consented to the registration of a junior mark, or to record a change in the ownership of a mark. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 5:57 am by Norman L. Eisen
” Trump has returned the compliment, saying of Roberts (and Heritage) that he’s “doing an unbelievable job, he’s bringing it back to levels we’ve never seen … thank you Kevin. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 10:05 am by Neil H. Buchanan
The neo-Nazis' excuse for staging the protests was the planned removal of statues of Robert E. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 6:15 pm by Yosi Yahoudai
THIS PROPOSAL, WHICH WOULD REQUIRE CHANGING THE POLITICAL REFORM ACT OF 1974, THAT MEANS IT WILL NEED A TWO THIRDS VOTE FROM THE LEGISLATURE AND THE GOVERNOR’S APPROVAL. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am by Bernard Bell
Many state and local officials host social media sites and use them to converse with followers on matters related to their governmental responsibilities, among other things.[1]  Not surprisingly, many choose to block from their sites certain members of the public they find disagreeable.[2] Being disagreeable, or at least in disagreement with such actions, blocked followers sometimes sue alleging that their exclusion violates the First Amendment.[3]  One of the most notable examples was a… [read post]