Search for: "Robert D. Forbes"
Results 101 - 120
of 202
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Sep 2010, 7:16 am
” Yesterday, Senator Patrick Leahy (D., Vt.), the Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman, introduced legislation that would allow retired Justices to sit by designation on the when active members are recused. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 4:00 am
Commentary comes from Syd Gernstein at Bloomberg BNA and JV DeLong at Forbes. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 6:21 am
Michael D. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 4:16 pm
Seriously, next time you see someone whip out their smartphone, ask them if they’d be willing to pay a 5% tax on it to funnel money into an FCC- or FTC-led corporate welfare program for favored media entities. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 6:31 am
Lutz, and Robert F. [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 6:00 am
” If you have or know of a recent (published in the last two or three days) article, post, or op-ed relating to the Court that you’d like us to consider for inclusion in the round-up, please send it to roundup [at] scotusblog.com. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 4:11 am
If you have or know of a recent (published in the last two or three days) article, post, podcast, or op-ed relating to the Supreme Court that you’d like us to consider for inclusion in the round-up, please send it to roundup [at] scotusblog.com. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 7:31 am
” In The New York Times, The Upshot illustrates what it describes as the Roberts Court’s “surprising move leftward. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 4:44 am
Tam are Mark Walsh at Education Week, Daniel Fisher at Forbes, Tony Mauro at Law.com (subscription or registration required), and Robert Barnes at The Washington Post, who reports that a “majority of the Supreme Court seemed highly skeptical” “that the federal government can refuse to register all trademarks that may be disparaging, casting this as the government improperly taking sides in free speech disputes. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 3:44 am
European Community, in which the Court will consider whether and to what extent RICO applies outside the United States, for this blog, with other coverage from Daniel Fisher of Forbes and law students Tyler Vandeventer and Jason Ottomano for Cornell. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 3:49 am
At ACS, Robert Smith discusses the decision, noting that it “strongly suggests that five justices on the Court” believe that a sentencer is required “to find that a juvenile is permanently incorrigible before imposing a LWOP sentence. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 3:55 am
Commentary comes from Nick Sibilla in an op-ed for Forbes and from Ruthann Robson at the Constitutional Law Prof Blog. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 5:32 pm
§ 27.001(7)(A), (B), (D). [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 4:38 am
” In Forbes, J.V. [read post]
21 May 2012, 10:06 am
Davis had indicated that he’d pledged approximately 775,000 shares, but “an inadvertent clerical error left the information out of the company’s February 2012 proxy statement. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 6:42 am
” This on the heels of Kagan’s colloquy with Senator Feinstein, during which Kagan expressed a view that Bench Memo’s Clarke D. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 12:29 am
" Roberts bluntly characterized the special masters appointed by the Court in such cases as "more akin to a law clerk than a district judge. [read post]
10 Nov 2016, 4:38 am
In her column in The New York Times, Linda Greenhouse observes that “Chief Justice Roberts heads a court that a harsh political spotlight has rendered too easy to dismiss as just another political branch of government, its members just politicians in robes,” and cautions that “he needs to make it clear that the Roberts court is not a tool of partisan politics. [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 4:43 am
” In an op-ed for Forbes, Mark Chenoweth takes “one final look back at the top 10 cases that were wrongly denied cert in the Supreme Court’s last term. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 5:43 am
” At Forbes, George Leef weighs in on Horne v. [read post]
