Search for: "Robert Kramer" Results 1 - 20 of 264
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Mar 2024, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal Supreme Court Rules Public Officials Can Sometimes Be Sued for Blocking Critics on Social Media Associated Press News – Mark Sherman | Published: 3/14/2024 A unanimous Supreme Court ruled public officials can sometimes be sued for blocking their critics on social media. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Seek to Curb Utility Spending on Politics, Ads and More Extras Arkansas Advocate – Robert Zullo | Published: 2/27/2024 After a string of scandals and amid rising bills, lawmakers in statehouses across the country have been pushing legislation to curb utilities spending ratepayer money on lobbying, expert testimony in rate cases, goodwill advertising, charitable giving, trade association memberships, and other costs. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 7:00 am by Guest Blogger
  As Jeremy Waldron, Larry Kramer, and many others have argued, a key pillar of American judicial conservatism has long been judicial supremacy, which Kramer defined as the assertive “notion that judges have the last word when it comes to constitutional interpretation and that their decisions determine the meaning of the Constitution for everyone. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 5:16 am by Beatrice Yahia
Kramer and Marc Santora report for the New York Times. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 8:37 pm by JD Hull
Derminer / Wayne Kramer Shakin' Street lyrics © BMG Rights Management, Warner Chappell Music, Inc [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 4:41 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
The litigation yielded a recent Decision and Order from Manhattan Commercial Division Justice Robert R. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 7:01 am by Randy E. Barnett
Gerhardt, The Power of Precedent (Oxford 2008) Robert Bennett & Lawrence Solum, Constitutional Originalism (Cornell 2011) Gary L McDowell, The Language of Law & the Foundations of American Constitutionalism (Cambridge 2010) Eric Segall, Supreme Myths: Why the Supreme Court Is Not a Court and Its Justices Are Not Judges (Praeger 2012) Michael Greve, The Upside-Down Constitution (Harvard 2012) Alexander Tsesis, The Thirteenth Amendment and American Freedom (NYU 2004) 2011: H. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 8:00 am by Mark Graber
  Larry Kramer and other popular constitutionalists remind us that words designed to be implemented by courts are far more likely to have legal meanings than words designed to be implemented by a dominant political party or virtuous elites in the elected branches of national government. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 1:24 pm by Nathan Dorn
For a quick primer on how that is done, see this useful post by Robert and Barbara. [read post]
20 Oct 2022, 4:42 am by Emma Snell
Kramer and Neil MacFarquhar report for the New York Times. [read post]
30 Aug 2022, 4:25 am by Emma Snell
Kramer reports for the New York Times. [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 3:06 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“Contrary to the plaintiffs’ contention, the Supreme Court properly granted that branch of the defendants’ motion which was to dismiss the third cause of action, to recover damages for legal malpractice against the law firm, Howard Fensterman, Robert Fensterman, Kathleen Eisman, as executor of the estate of Steven J. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 6:14 am by admin
Ohio 2015) (excluding Kramer); Luther v. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 2:29 pm by Randy E. Barnett
Gerhardt, The Power of Precedent (Oxford 2008) Robert Bennett & Lawrence Solum, Constitutional Originalism (Cornell 2011) Gary L McDowell, The Language of Law & the Foundations of American Constitutionalism (Cambridge 2010) Eric Segall, Supreme Myths: Why the Supreme Court Is Not a Court and Its Justices Are Not Judges (Praeger 2012) Michael Greve, The Upside-Down Constitution (Harvard 2012) Alexander Tsesis, The Thirteenth Amendment and American Freedom (NYU 2004) 2011: H. [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 7:00 am by Guest Blogger
Constitutional Catholics view Supreme Court decisions as authoritative pronouncements of constitutional meaning, while constitutional Protestants democratize constitutional contestation (see also Kramer 2004; Tushnet 2000). [read post]