Search for: "Robert Natelson"
Results 41 - 56
of 56
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2013, 12:04 am
For all of these conclusions, Thomas relies extremely heavily on Robert Natelson's Original Understanding of the Indian Commerce Clause, (and a little on Sai Prakash) although I can't tell for sure if Thomas's conclusions perfectly match theirs. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 10:14 am
The article covers a lot of ground, though it focuses particular attention on Robert Natelson's article "The Founders’ Hermeneutic: The Real Original Understanding of Original Intent," which appeared in Ohio State Law Journal back in 2007. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 11:27 am
Much more extensive discussion of the direct/indirect tax issue (but not of window taxes) can be found in Rob Natelson’s 27 minute podcast on the subject, for iVoices.org. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 2:46 pm
The Roberts opinion joins McCulloch v. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 7:45 am
David Kopel is the author of an excellent brief on behalf of the Independence Institute, Gary Lawson, Robert Natelson, and Guy Seidman, which focuses on a different aspect of the Necessary and Proper Clause. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 10:07 am
Natelson); Commerce in the Commerce Clause: A Response to Jack Balkin, 109 Michigan Law Review First Impressions 55 (2010) (with Natelson); and Health insurance is not ‘commerce’: A single erroneous Supreme Court precedent from 1944, South-Eastern Underwriters, should be overturned, National Law Journal, March 28, 2011 (with Natelson) (available on Lexix/Nexis).Since Scotusblog is trying to get people to comment on its own website, I’m not… [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 11:31 am
In preparation for a roundtable discussion I’ll be doing at Boston University Law School in October with Gary Lawson, Philip Hamburger, and John Manning, I’ve been reading Lawson, Geoffrey Miller, Robert Natelson, and Guy Seidman’s The Origins of the Necessary and Proper Clause (Cambridge, 2010). [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 1:25 pm
Natelson & our own David KopelHowever misguided I think his interpretation of “commerce,” I believe Jack’s new book to be a masterpiece. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 7:30 am
ROBERT NATELSON: Time Magazine’s Constitutional Baby Babble. [read post]
11 May 2011, 1:51 pm
Robert G. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 3:00 am
Miller, Robert G. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 2:37 pm
He argued for a convention in which the entire founding document is fair game.There's nothing to worry about, according Robert Natelson (of Independence Institute). [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 8:02 am
Yet as time went on, people came to see a convention as more nefarious, forming misconceptions about what it might mean, according to new research by Robert Natelson, who recently left his post as a law professor at the University of Montana to join the Independence Institute. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 4:05 pm
Another law professor who has raised constitutional questions about Obamcare is Rob Natelson (U. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 10:32 pm
Robert G. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 1:45 am
Professor Robert Natelson of the University of Montana has posted a 2007 article from the Ohio State Law Journal on "The Founders' Hermeneutic: The Real Original Understanding of Original Intent. [read post]
