Search for: "Roberts v. Adams" Results 21 - 40 of 1,792
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jan 2024, 6:30 am
Posted by the Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance, on Friday, January 26, 2024 Editor's Note: This roundup contains a collection of the posts published on the Forum during the week of January 19-25, 2024 Mergers and Acquisitions—2024 Posted by Victor Goldfeld, Mark Stagliano, and Mark Andriola, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, on Friday, January 19, 2024 Tags: Acquisition, Activism, Antitrust, Cross-border transactions, Energy, Healthcare, M&A, Merger, Private… [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 3:12 pm by Adam White
(Indeed, the Roberts Court has seemed uniquely attuned to the need for steadier administration for years.) [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 3:49 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
With respect to the state court cases, the defendants failed to submit evidence establishing, prima facie, the absence of at least one essential element of the legal malpractice cause of action (see Aqua-Trol Corp. v Wilentz, Goldamn & Spitzer, P.A., 197 AD3d 544, 545; Fricano v Law Offs. of Tisha Adams, 194 AD3d 1016, 1018). [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 2:02 am by INFORRM
On the same day there was a consequentials hearing in the case of LCG v OVD, QB-2022-000921. [read post]
26 Dec 2023, 2:17 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
In my earlier post, I criticized arguments made by former Attorney General William Barr and AEI's Adam White in support of certiorari in American Petroleum Institute v. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
Thirty years before Dobbs, the Supreme Court decided Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 4:40 am by Beatrice Yahia
Ronen Bergmen and Adam Goldman report for the New York Times. [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Robert Menendez is facing allegations he and his wife accepted “hundreds of thousands of dollars” in bribes. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 1:35 pm by Amy Howe
Representing Acheson, lawyer Adam Unikowsky urged the justices to focus on the question originally presented in the case: whether Laufer has a right to sue at all. [read post]