Search for: "Roberts v. Boothe"
Results 1 - 20
of 136
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jun 2019, 2:51 pm
Criminal law — Sufficiency of the evidence — Assault and use of firarm Appellant, Robert Eugene Booth, Jr., was convicted in the Circuit Court of Anne Arundel County of two counts of first degree assault, two counts of second degree assault, two counts of reckless endangerment, one count of use of a firearm in the ... [read post]
30 May 2012, 11:19 am
Robert F. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 2:49 pm
Booth Trust v. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 5:00 am
Booth Trust v. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 9:46 am
Div., Decided by Robert P. [read post]
21 May 2007, 2:26 pm
Booth, denying that state courts could issue writs of habeas corpus to persons in federal custody. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 6:58 am
Booth Computer, App. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 8:53 pm
Reading over Chief Justice Roberts' Medellin opinion, it reminds me a lot of Justice Stevens' majority opinion in Hamdan v. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 1:20 pm
Robert E. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 12:10 pm
You go into a phone booth, you’re in a public; making your calls within the phone booth is subject to a reasonable expectation of privacy. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 10:19 am
In Prigg v. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 4:55 pm
The difficulty was compounded last year by the ruling in Devaney v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:06 pm
In the absence of such information, the Board rejected Roberts' medical opinion as not credible, which it was entitled to do (see Matter of Glowczynski v Suburban Restoration Co., Inc., 174 AD3d at 1237; Matter of Yanas v Bimbo Bakeries, 134 AD3d 1321, 1321 [2015]). [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:06 pm
In the absence of such information, the Board rejected Roberts' medical opinion as not credible, which it was entitled to do (see Matter of Glowczynski v Suburban Restoration Co., Inc., 174 AD3d at 1237; Matter of Yanas v Bimbo Bakeries, 134 AD3d 1321, 1321 [2015]). [read post]
24 Jul 2007, 8:26 am
"They did not 'pick the lock' and avoid or bypass the protective measure, because there was no lock to pick," Kelly wrote in Healthcare Advocates Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 10:03 am
In Katz v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 11:44 am
” Roberts v. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 10:12 pm
Apropos of nothing: Katz v. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 9:32 am
Booth Trust v. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 10:45 am
Here are a few quick running thoughts from today's oral argument in Minnesota Voters Alliance v. [read post]
