Search for: "Roberts v. Commission on Judicial Performance (1983)" Results 1 - 20 of 22
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jan 2019, 2:55 pm by MOTP
Appeal from the 241st Judicial District Court, Smith County, Texas.Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J. [read post]
25 Apr 2021, 8:45 pm by James Romoser and Andrew Hamm
Federal Communications Commission 20-1354Issues: (1) Whether the U.S. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am by Bernard Bell
§1983 (“section 1983”),[4] and, for that matter, the Fourteenth Amendment’s “state action” requirement.[5] The Court framed the issue before it as a choice between two competing standards. [read post]
19 Jul 2008, 12:19 pm
ON APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT FOR LAKE COUNTY, STATE OF FLORIDA INITIAL BRIEF OF APPELLANT Mark S. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 9:06 pm by Bryn Hines
Pierce explained that in 1983, the Supreme Court’s MVMA v. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 2:19 pm by Jim Harper
Fairly read, the Court has stated that Congress’ actions under the Copyright/Patent Clause are, for all intents and purposes, judicially unreviewable. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 1:19 pm by ligitsec
Pp. 560-569. 723 F.2d 195 (CA2 1983), reversed and remanded. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 2:09 pm by Robinson, Calcagnie & Robinson
CPSC 2008 Performance and Accountability Report, November 2008) Meanwhile, traffic fatalities in the United States have fallen to record lows. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 4:00 am by Administrator
While the subject of this paper is legal information, it has a particular focus on case law: legal authority which derives from the prior pronouncements of courts, judges or other judicial bodies in the course of exercising their judicial functions. [read post]