Search for: "Roberts v. Short" Results 1 - 20 of 3,135
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Nov 2023, 3:30 am by Edward Rubin
Edward Rubin The Roberts Court may well overturn the Chevron doctrine this Term, despite the affection for stare decisis that Chief Justice Roberts himself expressed in the related case of Kisor v. [read post]
8 Apr 2007, 1:42 am
Linda Greenhouse's meditation on John Roberts's dissent in the global warming case (Massachusetts v. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 2:27 pm by firstamendmentblogger
Scotusblog presents Georgetown Law prof Rebecca Tushnet’s short essay “The Constitutionality of Zombie Copyrights,” recapping the last week’s oral argument in Golan v. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 4:26 pm
The tactic, in short, is to purport to respect a precedent while in fact interpreting it into oblivion. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 4:26 pm
The tactic, in short, is to purport to respect a precedent while in fact interpreting it into oblivion. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 7:19 pm by James Hamilton
The very short concurring opinion of Justice Ginsburg in the Supreme Court's Halliburton opinion looms very large, given that the opinion was joined by Justices Sotomajor and Breyer and the Court's opinion by Chief Justice Roberts and joined by Justices Kennedy and Kagan does not have a majority without it. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 3:22 pm by Gene Quinn
The rest of the defense of the thesis that the Roberts Court is pro-business centers almost exclusively around the Supreme Court’s First Amendment ruling in Citizens United v. [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 12:27 pm by Josh Blackman
Roberts's misreading of Marbury is a rehash of Cooper v. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 8:10 pm by Orin Kerr
Clancy has posted a short essay, “The Irrelevancy of the Fourth Amendment in the Roberts Court,” predicting “the substantial elimination of Fourth Amendment litigation in the Roberts Court. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 1:29 pm by Charley Moore
Perhaps the most egregiously political deviation from precedent since Bush v. [read post]
3 Dec 2023, 11:48 am by Steven Calabresi
It turns out that Chief Justice Roberts was the only one of the nine justices to get NFIB v. [read post]