Search for: "Roberts v. Strickland" Results 41 - 60 of 101
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Sep 2009, 1:40 pm
Newton's execution on May 24, 2007, took nearly two hours with efforts to find IV sites.Coverage of the Baze v. [read post]
6 Apr 2007, 4:28 pm
The Michigan Supreme Court rejected Riley's claim, holding that Riley's counsel was not deficient within the meaning of Strickland v. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 9:57 pm by Rick Hasen
In the same Term that the Court avoided the constitutional question in NAMUDNO, it used the same avoidance canon to narrowly construe a different provision of the Voting Rights Act in Bartlett v Strickland, and it applied constitutional avoidance (in deed if not in name) to narrowly construe Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act in Ricci v DeStefano, the controversial New Haven firefighters case. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 11:10 am by John Elwood
Texas, 18-9674Issue: Whether the standard for assessing ineffective assistance of counsel claims, announced in Strickland v. [read post]
11 Feb 2018, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
The US Supreme Court heard argument last month in McCoy v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 4:43 am by Amy Howe
Kulbicki, a case on last week’s Conference at which the Court has been asked to review whether a court violates Strickland v. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 6:24 am by Kali Borkoski
These include making a pitch for jury nullification (Strickland), letting the client commit perjury (Nix v. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 8:17 am by Amy Howe
It argued that the lower court had misapplied the Supreme Court’s 1984 decision in Strickland v. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 1:36 pm by Rumpole
If you're poor and not yet convicted, you may get the benefit of a Strickland v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 7:30 am by Steve Vladeck
The second is where appointed counsel in the initial-review collateral proceeding, where the claim should have been raised, was ineffective under the standards of Strickland v. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 8:28 am by Jon Sands
Nevertheless, the court found no Strickland prejudice at the guilt phase. [read post]