Search for: "Roberts v. Watts"
Results 1 - 20
of 99
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2011, 9:00 pm
Matter of Watt v Roberts, 2010 NY Slip Op 09171, decided on December 14, 2010, Appellate Division, First Department An arbitration panel selected by the Transport Workers Union of America, Local 100 and the New York City Transit Authority and... [read post]
9 May 2013, 10:59 am
Seamon, Andrew Siegel, Joseph Thai, and Kathryn Watts. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 4:08 am
Arbitrators generally permitted independent recourse to third-party sources when necessary to confirm technical informationMatter of Watt v Roberts, 2010 NY Slip Op 09171, decided on December 14, 2010, Appellate Division, First DepartmentAn arbitration panel selected by the Transport Workers Union of America, Local 100 and the New York City Transit Authority and the Manhattan and Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority granted a 3% wage increase to employees of the… [read post]
6 May 2011, 2:51 am
Jackson in Watts v. [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 6:03 am
Sixty-eight years ago, in Watts v. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 6:50 am
By Tom Watts In light of the Virginia gay marriage decision last week, Bostic v. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 3:42 am
Mrs Rooney applied to join Caroline Watt (Mrs Vardy’s agent) to the proceedings and for specific disclosure. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 4:43 am
Parsing the Oral Arguments: FEF and Beckstead & Watts v. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 3:26 pm
Attorney Tiftickjian uses this wise passage in his post; More than 60 years ago, in Watts v. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 7:10 am
This concept is being challenged again in Ball v. [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 1:25 pm
Professor Mank discusses the impact of the Court’s loosening of the standing requirements for states in the Massachusetts v. [read post]
25 Sep 2011, 11:26 pm
The speakers for the fall 2011 will be: 21st October: Launching PILAGG (Horatia Muir Watt & Diego Fernandez Arroyo: introduction to the PILAGG research project) 28th October: Launching PILAGG Junior Stream (Ivana Isailovitch: “Recognition and legal pluralism”) 17th November (exceptionally a Thursday): Robert WAI, “Private v. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 11:38 am
Instead of reading the boys’ story in terms of descent from clothing to nakedness, Watt reads it in terms of the constancy of dress. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 5:45 am
In the Watts case, Robert Watts was convicted of violating § 871(a). [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 10:12 am
As noted in prior posts here and here and here, the Sixth Circuit is currently considering en banc review of the continuing use of acquitted conduct as a sentencing enhancement after Booker in the wake of a panel's notable per curiam ruling in US v. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 9:36 am
ROBERT DENNIS MALLOY, Appellant. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 1:06 pm
More on Atkins v. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 2:12 am
Fernandez Arroyo, Introduction to the PILAGG research project)October 28, 2011: Ivana Isailovitch, “Recognition and legal pluralism”November 17, 2011: Robert Wai, “Private v. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 8:13 pm
Once again the focus of the lecture was on litigants in landmark twentieth-century cases – this time, the petitioners in the 1969 case Tinker v. [read post]
5 Jun 2006, 6:08 am
Conley v. [read post]
