Search for: "Roberts v. Wills" Results 161 - 180 of 1,902
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Aug 2022, 11:18 am by Neil H. Buchanan
  Though it is less well known, and before it became politically necessary for now-jurists John Roberts, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett to dutifully carry out their part of the 2000 Republican strategy that resulted the 5-4 Bush v. [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
This post was prepared for a roundtable on Wrestling with Religious Diversity, convened as part of LevinsonFest 2022—a year-long series gathering scholars from diverse disciplines and viewpoints to reflect on Sandy Levinson’s influential work in constitutional law. [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 4:50 am by Emma Snell
In the 2013 report from the Justice Department inspector general, investigators said they did “not believe” Joseph V. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
If parents have a right to send their children to private schools, as Pierce v. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 9:49 am by Michael Froomkin
Group 20: Re-Elect Robert Watson Group 20 pits another previously unelected incumbent, Judge Robert Watson, against a  competent challenger … with a Hispanic name. [read post]
10 Jul 2022, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
  Bickel trusted the Court to discern our deepest “fundamental values,” such as a commitment to racial justice that required the invalidation of segregation in Brown v. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 11:18 pm by Josh Blackman
Roberts and Kavanaugh joined the Court's three progressives in four 5-4 cases: Biden v. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 9:00 am by Neil H. Buchanan
  These five are, we are to believe, the best of the best -- perhaps only exceeded by their favorite martyr, Robert Bork. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 11:10 am by Michael Ehline
John Roberts’ 2005 confirmation was the only one in recent history backed by a greater percentage of respondents in a Gallup poll, as the result sat at 59%. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 10:09 pm by Josh Blackman
Don't make a point through loose rhetoric that you are not willing to make directly. [read post]