Search for: "Robertson v. Chambers" Results 21 - 40 of 50
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Feb 2012, 1:30 am by INFORRM
Chambers’ earlier Crown Court appeal was unsuccessful. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 2:30 am by INFORRM
As noted below, the Administrative Court will hear the appeal in the case of R (Chambers) v DPP on Wednesday. [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 8:42 am by Dave
Three decisions of the Administrative Appeals Chamber of the Upper Tribunal on HB matters stand out: SS v North East Lincolnshire Council (HB) [2011] UKUT 300 (AAC); MB v Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea (HB) [2011] UKUT 321 (AAC); MR v Bournemouth Borough Council (HB) [2011] UKUT 284 (AAC). [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 8:42 am by Dave
Three decisions of the Administrative Appeals Chamber of the Upper Tribunal on HB matters stand out: SS v North East Lincolnshire Council (HB) [2011] UKUT 300 (AAC); MB v Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea (HB) [2011] UKUT 321 (AAC); MR v Bournemouth Borough Council (HB) [2011] UKUT 284 (AAC). [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 8:19 am
The leverage used to increase derivatives bets “is like playing Russian roulette with six bullets in the chamber,” said Das, who isn’t familiar with Abbar’s case. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 5:15 pm by INFORRM
A necessary ingredient of a claim in malicious falsehood is that special damage must follow as a direct and natural result of the publication (see Kaye v Robertson [1991] FSR 62, at 67). [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 3:54 am by Graeme Hall
A guest post on the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights’ decision in Palomo Sànchez v. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 8:40 am by Steve Hall
When I was the lone American lawyer advising the Appeals Chamber of the U.N. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 5:07 pm by INFORRM
Whilst the Calcutt Committee was deliberating the case of Kaye v Robertson ([1991] FSR 62) came before the Courts. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
  She heard extensive submissions from Mr Geoffrey Robertson QC in support of the application, relying on the common law and the then Strasbourg jurisprudence. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 4:16 am by INFORRM
On Tuesday the Fourth Section of the European Court of Human Rights heard the application in the case of Mosley v United Kingdom. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 10:22 pm by legalinformatics
Lindsey Harvell, Kylie Robertson, & Gwendelyn Nisbett, Can Game-Frames be Contained? [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 3:57 am by INFORRM
  Lord Rodger said: “Article 8 and reputation 37           On behalf of the press, Mr Robertson QC did not dispute that article 8 rights fall within the scope of “the rights of others” in article 10(2). [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 5:53 pm by INFORRM
In Robertson v Dogz Online Pty Ltd & Anor ([2010] QCA 295) the Queensland Court of Appeal allowed the appeal of a litigant in person against the striking out of her statement of claim. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 5:56 am by charonqc
He defended the last two cases brought for blasphemy in the UK against Salman Rushdie (R (ex parte Choudhury) v Bow Street Magistrates Court [1991] 1 QB 429) and Gay News (R v Gay News Ltd [1979] AC 617). [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 12:57 am by Adam Wagner
In Sanoma Uitgevers B.V. v. the Netherlands, the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights found, unanimously, a violation of article 10 ECHR. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 5:25 pm by INFORRM
A majority of the Grand Chamber (13-4) found that there was no violation of Article 10. [read post]