Search for: "Robertson v. Department of Defense" Results 1 - 20 of 55
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jun 2017, 8:15 am by Steven Boutwell
Department of Defense, challenges whether law suits over the WOTUS rule should be heard in the federal district courts or federal appellate courts (currently pending in 6th Circuit). [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 7:07 am
Quon (08-1332), Robertson v. [read post]
18 Jul 2008, 5:01 pm
  Georgetown law professor Neal Katyal, one of the defense lawyers, said: “We have decided not to appeal Judge Robertson’s decision. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 3:17 pm
  District Judge James Robertson, moving this new case along swiftly, has told the Justice Department to file its opposition on Monday, July 14, and detainee’s counsel to file their reply on Wednesday, July 16. [read post]
14 Sep 2013, 11:28 am by Donald Thompson
Such misconduct may impair a defendant's due process rights and require a reversal of the conviction (see, e.g., People v Robertson, 12 NY2d 355; People v Savvides, 1 NY2d 554; People v Creasy, 236 NY 205; Napue v Illinois, 360 US 264; Alcorta v Texas, 355 US 28). [read post]
30 Jul 2022, 6:01 am by Benjamin Pollard
Matt Perault detailed the shifting partisan fault lines in speech policy after Dobbs v. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 5:58 am by Susan Brenner
Supreme Court recognized a related defense – the entrapment-by-estoppel defense – in Raley v. [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 6:31 pm
This Defense Department webpage contains the pleadings and exhibits. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 9:00 am by Steve Vladeck
The legal issue the Justices will confront on Tuesday when they hear oral argument in Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Once this system takes hold, it forms a true equilibrium from which only oddball states (Maine and Nebraska) will depart. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 9:05 pm by Dan Flynn
 A federal district court judge in Texas has set the starting trial date for the United States v. [read post]
18 May 2021, 7:31 pm by Vercammen Law
Technical erroneous statute charged not defense to refusal here STATE v.SHARON COURSEY,Defendant-Appellant. [read post]
16 Jul 2008, 9:05 pm
In opposing the request, the Justice Department on Monday had argued that, after the Supreme Court on June 12 ruled (in Boumediene v. [read post]
27 Feb 2022, 11:10 am by Katherine Pompilio
   Ben Waldman and Michel Paradis discussed how the Defense Department can incorporate certain checks and balances into the targeting process to deter circumvention. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 6:30 pm
He also noted the relatively small number of death sentences handed out in capital trials in recent years and the deplorable funding for indigent defense. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 2:56 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Co. of N.Y., 98 NY2d at 326; see Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d at 88; Robertson v Wells, 95 AD3d 862, 863; Magnus v Sklover, 95 AD3d 837, 837). [read post]