Search for: "Robin v. Smith" Results 41 - 60 of 210
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Sep 2018, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Legal Studies Paper (2018)).Shahbaz Ahmad Cheema, Revisiting Abdul Kadir v Salima: Locus Classicus on Civil Nature of Marriage? [read post]
5 Aug 2018, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
A number of important media law cases have been decided by the English courts in the past 12 months including Sir Cliff Richard OBE v BBC [2018] EWHC 1837 (Ch) this has perhaps been the most high profile and discussed case of the year and has been the subject of a wide range of Inforrm posts including by Robin Callender-Smith, Jonathan Coad, Paul Wragg, Brian Cathcart, Jelena Gligorijević and Thomas Bennett (Parts 1 and 2). [read post]
22 Jul 2018, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
Robin Callender-Smith on Inforrm, “Cliff Richard judgment a new shift in legal balance between free speech and privacy” Paul Wragg on Inforrm, “Why Sir Cliff Richard’s case was wrongly decided” Jonathan Coad on Inforrm, “Privacy Cliff’s courageous battle with the BBC brings the right outcome –  Media lawyers lined up to comment on the decision – not always accurately. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 4:43 pm by INFORRM
Robin Callender Smith, Professor of Media Law, Queen Mary University of London This article was originally published on The Conversation. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 4:44 am by Ben
Second, even had the Gayes preserved their challenge, neither Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 50(b) nor our decisions in Westinghouse and El-Hakem v. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 10:48 pm
 Sir Robin first asked lawyers in the audience to respond with a show of hands - has the decision in Actavis v Eli Lilly improved the law? [read post]
28 Oct 2017, 5:01 am by Garrett Hinck, Matthew Kahn
Sabrina McCubbin summarized pre-trial motions in Smith v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 4:09 am by Edith Roberts
Robin Grieff and Hillary Rich previewed the case for Cornell; On the Docket also offers a preview, and Subscript provides a graphic explainer. [read post]
21 Sep 2017, 2:58 am by Walter Olson
Meyer, Philip Miles, Eugene Volokh, Tammy Binford/HRHero] Municipal worker with brain injury could not perform “the essential functions of his job,” per a neurologist’s letter, jury award plus backpay calculation totals $354,070 [Robin Shea on Stragapede v. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 6:59 am by Brian Cordery
Panellist Joel Smith thought that there was political will for the UK participation but it was just one of many pieces in a very complicated puzzle. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 4:23 am by Edith Roberts
” In The George Washington Law Review, Robin Maher discusses last week’s decision in Buck v. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 10:48 pm
Researching the answer In KCI v Smith & Nephew [2010] EWHC 1487 (Pat), Arnold J held that information that would be acquired by the skilled person as a matter of routine can, in addition to CGK, be taken into account in considering inventive step. [read post]