Search for: "Robinson v Holder" Results 1 - 20 of 90
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm by Marty Lederman
As I explained in one of my earlier posts, several or all of the Justices might be inclined to decide the case on some ground that doesn’t require the Court to decide whether Donald Trump is eligible to be President, if such an “off-ramp” solution is legally available. [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 7:00 am by Guest Blogger
This post was prepared for a roundtable on Constitutional Faith and Veneration, convened as part of LevinsonFest 2022—a year-long series gathering scholars from diverse disciplines and viewpoints to reflect on Sandy Levinson’s influential work in constitutional law. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 8:01 am by William Ford, Victoria Gallegos
The subcommittee will hear testimony from Linda Robinson, director of the Center for Middle East Public Policy at the RAND Corporation; retired Lt. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 3:54 am by Edith Roberts
At Bloomberg Law, Kimberly Robinson reports that the ruling in Barton “has made it harder for longtime green card holders with a criminal conviction to remain in the United States. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 10:53 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Despite the court’s punt on this issue, I believe the default position is that social media accounts are official accounts so long as the holder is in office. [read post]
16 Dec 2018, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
Reporters without Borders and the National Union of Journalists have contacted by policy holders. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 5:31 am by Barry Sookman
This was rejected in 2012 after being opposed by the creative sector.[5] The argument that Canada’s adoption of fair use would just align Canada’s fair dealing with U.S. fair use fails to recognize the prejudice to rights holders. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 3:25 am by Peter Mahler
See Tzolis v Wolff, 10 NY3d 100, 108 (2008) (quoting Robinson v Smith, 3 Paige Ch. 222, 232–33 (NY Ch. 1832)). [read post]
29 Mar 2018, 7:01 am by John Elwood
(relisted after the March 2, March 16 and March 23 conferences)   Robinson v. [read post]