Search for: "Robinson v. Kerr"
Results 1 - 20
of 36
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2014, 7:37 am
See Ontario v. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 6:09 pm
Judge Robinson had concluded that the patent was valid, and applied the test articulated in eBay Inc. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 1:21 am
This decision was less of a surprise than Robinson v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police [2018] UKSC 4 – given the strength of the earlier judgments both at first instance and in the Court of Appeal. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 2:06 pm
Robinson. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 12:16 pm
Robinson 414 U.S. 218 (1973). [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 3:57 am
” At the Volokh Conspiracy (via How Appealing), Orin Kerr urges the court to review Van Buren v. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 10:18 am
Robinson relied on United States v. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 1:18 pm
Robinson relied on United States v. [read post]
1 Aug 2017, 7:20 am
As Orin Kerr wrote of the Supreme Court’s 2001 thermal-imaging case, Kyllo v. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 12:49 pm
(Orin Kerr) In Davis v. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 10:11 am
(Orin Kerr) Yesterday the Fourth Circuit handed down an interesting Fourth Amendment decision in United States v. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 11:09 pm
The case is United States v. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 6:10 am
Wurie and Riley v. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 6:52 am
In an op-ed for The Hill, Gerard Robinson urges the Court to grant rehearing in Friedrichs v. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 11:03 am
Wurie and Riley v. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 12:49 am
Robinson; “sometimes,” primarily under Arizona v. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 4:16 pm
Robinson; 2) precedents for how the law applies to searches of space in a home around the arrestee, leading to Chimel v. [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 1:00 am
Robinson v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police, heard 12 Jul 2017. [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 2:00 am
Robinson v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police, heard 12 Jul 2017. [read post]
4 Jan 2019, 4:14 am
” At Reason’s Volokh Conspiracy blog, Orin Kerr offers his take on why the plaintiffs in Frank v. [read post]
