Search for: "Robinson v. South Carolina, State of" Results 1 - 20 of 65
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jul 2012, 6:39 pm
 The deputation  issued the following statement:Due to the actions of General Convention, the South Carolina Deputation has concluded that we cannot continue with business as usual. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 8:36 am by Bob Farb
The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, on a rehearing of a case en banc, held in United States v. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 8:36 am by Bob Farb
The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, on a rehearing of a case en banc, held in United States v. [read post]
9 May 2012, 4:17 pm by Gregory Forman
 Further the answer was unclear with different states taking different approaches and South Carolina case law silent on the issue. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 8:03 am
Opening a new Term, the Supreme Court on Monday allowed the state of South Carolina to begin a lawsuit directly in the Court against its neighbor, North Carolina, in a dispute over alleged diversion of water from the Catawba River (138 Original). [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 5:00 am by Amanda Pickens Nitto
Captain George’s of South Carolina, LP, et al., No. 4:19-cv-800 (D.S.C. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 12:35 pm by Amanda Pickens Nitto
Not every class action court filing in North and South Carolina becomes a full-length post on our blog. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 4:46 pm
Notice the deep disconnect here: the Episcopal Diocese of South Carolina has existed continuously as an entity in South Carolina since 1785 -- before ECUSA itself ever came into being. [read post]
4 Aug 2013, 6:43 am by Howard Friedman
When he was offending, he told victims that he was a Sunday school teacher and planned to become a pastor.In Robinson v. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 3:35 am
Robinson, 396 S.C. 577, 722 S.E.2d 820 (South Carolina Supreme Court 2012). [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  North Carolina and Rhode Island had not ratified the Constitution, but significantly neither state rejected it. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 5:00 am by Beck, et al.
Pa. 1985) (can’t tell what state’s law); Seiden v. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 12:53 pm by Eugene Volokh
Somers is still the law in South Carolina. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 10:52 am by Anna Christensen
Title: State of South Carolina v. [read post]