Search for: "Robinson v. State of Maine" Results 41 - 60 of 141
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 May 2008, 12:14 pm
Having set out its commonsense goal, the judgment performs some remarkable acrobatics to show that this view is either compatible with, or distinguishable from previous cases: Mohamed v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC [2002] 1 AC 547; Sahardid v Camden LBC [2005] HLR page 11; and in finding support in Robinson v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC [2006] 1 WLR 3295. [read post]
21 May 2019, 3:51 am by Edith Roberts
At Bloomberg Law, Kimberly Robinson reports that “[r]etired Justice Anthony Kennedy lamented the state of civic discourse May 20 while speaking to a room full of prominent attorneys and judges. [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 4:05 am by Edith Roberts
Amy Howe analyzes yesterday’s argument in Maine Community Health Options v. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 5:00 am by Doug Cornelius
Cahill taps firms tied to state pension investor By Aaron Lester, Michele Richinick, and Walter V. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 3:21 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
R (Robinson) v The Governor of HMP Whatton & Anor and related cases, heard 19-21 May 2014. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 8:03 am
Maine People's Alliance -- scope of citizens' rights to force a cleanup of hazardous wastes. 06-1543, Saouvong v. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 2:58 pm by Mark Walsh
Also here supporting the state is Mae Nan Robinson Ellingson, who at age 24 in 1972 was the youngest delegate to Montana’s constitutional convention that year. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 1:44 pm
., dismissed the claim of copyright infringement, stating that even if Pyrrha Design owned the copyright in the designs, Plum & Posey did not infringe it.The main questions raised by the Court in this case are the following:Does copyright subsist in any of the Pyrrha Designs because they are original artistic works? [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 7:37 am
 Indeed, the practice of obtaining and executing Anton Piller orders was subject to a critical review by Mr Justice Scott in Columbia Picture Industries v Robinson [1986] (and see also the article "Piller problems"(1990) 106 LQR 601 by Professor Dockray and, as he then was, Hugh Laddie QC). [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 6:47 am by John Elwood
United States, 17-5476, as well as returning relist Robinson v. [read post]
20 Dec 2020, 8:43 am by Anna Salvatore, Tia Sewell
Robert Chesney and Steve Vladeck shared an episode of the National Security Law Podcast about the latest developments in the TikTok lawsuit and the Justice Department and the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 6:11 am
[To compare the two ads click here] The Times' CEO Janet Robinson stated yesterday that the Greater New York section had not had an impact on the Times' circulation. [read post]