Search for: "Robles v. People"
Results 21 - 40
of 65
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Mar 2019, 8:18 am
” This is a familiar argument that has gotten some traction for Americans with Disabilities Act claims against websites (I eventually will blog the 9th Circuit’s Robles case on that point). [read post]
20 Jan 2019, 6:16 pm
The Ninth Circuit’s January 15, 2019 opinion in Robles v. [read post]
26 Dec 2018, 6:00 am
In another big-rig accident case that settled for $3 million in 2018 (Medeiros v. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 5:52 am
Jones v. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 2:00 pm
The class action case, IEIYC & Arreola v. [read post]
4 Feb 2018, 10:40 am
Website Accessibility* If Punxsutawney Phil had seen Robles v. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 8:26 am
In fact, Gorsuch’s two best-known decisions on administrative law – Gutierrez-Brizuela and De Niz Robles v. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 12:22 pm
A year earlier, Gorsuch had sounded some of the same themes in a decision for the court in De Niz Robles v. [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 7:22 am
” Katyal cited two immigration cases, De Niz Robles v. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 1:22 pm
” De Niz Robles v. [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 12:11 pm
Ass’n v. [read post]
19 May 2016, 6:02 pm
WINN v. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 7:28 pm
” Although his employer suggested this alleged harassment was not severe or pervasive, the foreman was a type of supervisor, reasonable people might find this offensive, and most importantly, the farmworker estimated that there were roughly 60 such statements (four comments a day for 15 days), which the court found “more than sporadic, it is a pattern of routine conduct” (Robles v. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 7:57 pm
People v. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 5:40 am
Robles, supra. [read post]
11 Sep 2014, 12:12 pm
The police are called about a shooting on Indigo Street, and officers Orozco and Robles, who were in the vicinity, promptly saw two cars travelling on Indigo at a high rate of speed. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 10:21 am
Robles. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 4:10 am
In People of the State of New York v. [read post]
16 May 2012, 12:17 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 6:41 am
” In other words, the denial of marriage to some people will not affect the actions of other people. [read post]
