Search for: "Roche v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 537
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Dec 2023, 5:29 am
We are now poised on the brink of a referral on description amendments, courtesy of Roche (T 56/21). [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 1:25 am
Roche's proposed questions are as follows: 1. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 9:25 am
”[12] Importantly, there is no presumption of cost reasonableness.[13] If an initial review of the facts results in the Government challenging a specific cost, the contractor has the burden to prove that the cost is reasonable.[14] The FAR provides that whether a cost is reasonable depends on a “variety of considerations and circumstances,” including the following: Whether it is the type of cost generally recognized as ordinary and necessary for the conduct of the… [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 1:23 am
Hoffmann-La Roche AG together with Chugai Pharmaceutical Co. [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 12:52 pm
Sears v. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Corp. v Kassis, 182 AD2d 22, 27 [1st Dept 1992] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted], lv dismissed and denied 80 NY2d 1005 [1992]; see Foley v Roche, 68 AD2d 558, 567-568 [1st Dept 1979]). [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Corp. v Kassis, 182 AD2d 22, 27 [1st Dept 1992] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted], lv dismissed and denied 80 NY2d 1005 [1992]; see Foley v Roche, 68 AD2d 558, 567-568 [1st Dept 1979]). [read post]
New EBA referral: When is prior use of a product excluded from the prior art for lack of enablement?
30 Jun 2023, 12:57 am
Importantly, the enablement test permits the skilled person to use common general knowledge but not prior art documents that do not form part of the CGK.The referring Board of Appeal also identified diverging decisions on the appropriate criteria for assessing the ability of a skilled person to analyse and reproduce the disclosed product, particularly over the level of analysis required and the degree of variability permitted in reproduction (as discussed in Takeda v… [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 12:29 am
Is a product put on the market before the date of filing of a European patent application to be excluded from the state of the art within the meaning of Article 54(2) EPC for the sole reason that its composition or internal structure could not be analysed and reproduced without undue burden by the skilled person before that date? [read post]
A “Strong Likelihood” of Change: Sixth Circuit Joins the Fifth in Raising the FLSA Certification Bar
22 May 2023, 9:53 am
In 1989, in the seminal Hoffmann-La Roche, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 1:18 pm
EU has been first mover on some things and not others (Art. 17 v notice and takedown). [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 10:51 am
Avoids problems of regulatory arbitrage. 230 v. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 7:48 am
Roche-Laguna: there is a gray area. [read post]
5 Apr 2023, 5:18 am
A similar situation arose a few years in Pfizer v Roche [2019] EWHC 1520 (Pat). [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 12:30 pm
Panelists include: Cristina V. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm
The school lost its accreditation in 1946, and closed.[19] After receiving this degree, Selikoff continued his efforts to return to Scotland, to complete his “triple qualification” for medical licensure in Scotland, which would allow him to sit for the licensing examination in one of the United States. 1943 – 1944. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 4:05 pm
Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. v. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 4:05 pm
Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. v. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 3:34 am
Disputed Expulsion of Law Firm Partner Raises Jurisdictional Issue In Roche Cyrulnik Freedman LLP v Cyrulnik, five of the six founding partners in the law firm Roche Cyrulnik Freedman LLP (“RCF”), organized as a Florida limited liability partnership, expelled the sixth partner, Jason Cyrulnik, pursuant to a provision in the partners’ memorandum of understanding (“MOU”) authorizing the removal of a partner for cause upon the affirmative vote… [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 12:25 pm
Václav Bartuška, the Czech ambassador-at-large for Energy Security.. [read post]
