Search for: "Rock v. Rock"
Results 41 - 60
of 5,729
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jan 2024, 1:35 pm
Supreme Court, in 1993, handed down Stinson v. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 8:30 am
Check out Gamboa v. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 10:00 pm
”)Interestingly, because of the decedent’s exposure to “heavy metal poisoning,” the AD1 remanded the matter for further proceedings to determine whether that qualified as a “covered” TWC condition.Looks like they’re about to rock ‘n roll ….# # #DECISIONMatter of H. v Shea [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 2:58 pm
The Supreme Court will consider the constitutionality of HB20 in NetChoice, LLC v. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 9:18 am
He appeared in many of the leading defamation cases over a period of over 40 years, including the case of Irving v Penguin Books [2000] EWHC QB 155 and McDonalds v Steel [1997] EWHC QB 366. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 12:42 pm
(A complication that could have been avoided had someone else written the opinion and then had Judge Friedland join that opinion with the slight addition of her supplemental footnote.)Still, a big day for Judge Friedland, and a way to rock in 2024.P.S. - She almost made it a full decade. [read post]
1 Jan 2024, 3:00 am
On the DOJ’s 2020 Complaint Against Google and Revenue Sharing Agreements as Non-Compete Arrangements Omar Vásquez Duque Stanford University; Rock Center for Corporate Governance; Stanford University Abstract In October 2020, the Department of Justice sued... [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 7:29 am
Glover v. [read post]
26 Dec 2023, 9:01 pm
Or would it be anti-democratic to deny a popular 17-year-old rock star access to the presidential ballot because a President must be at least thirty-five years old? [read post]
25 Dec 2023, 10:00 pm
")Now that's rock bottom.# # #DECISIONN.F. v. [read post]
25 Dec 2023, 3:00 am
Taking Behavioral Antitrust Seriously: On Default Agreements as Exclusive Dealing and Default Randomization as a Remedy to Promote Competition Omar Vásquez Duque Stanford University; Rock Center for Corporate Governance; Stanford University Abstract Antitrust scholarship has tended to stay away from... [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 12:30 pm
But officials broke "[v]irtually every promise" they made. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 7:44 am
Ill.) in Robe Probe v. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 2:31 pm
"] From Elden v. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 4:48 pm
The Departments establishment of the IDR fee for post-February 20, 2025 disputes and their previous December 15, 2023 announcement of the full reopening of the IDR portal for all dispute categories are part of the Departments’ ongoing response to the August 3, 2023 Federal District court ruling in Texas Medical Association, et al. v. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 6:30 am
For Sunstein, originalism is unable to accommodate cases such as Brown v. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 12:54 pm
The Utah Court of Appeals recently issued its decision in the case of Metropolitan Water District of Salt Lake & Sandy v. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 7:18 am
El 12 de agosto se logra la mayoría en diputados para llevar al Senado la destitución de Vázquez. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 3:06 pm
Oh Mickey, you’re so fine—but you’re not alone: An avalanche of copyrighted works will enter the public domain in the United States on January 1, 2024. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 6:41 am
Summit Entertainment * Cease & Desist Letter to iTunes Isn’t Covered by 17 USC 512(f)–Red Rock v. [read post]
