Search for: "Rodeo Family Enters., LLC v Matte"
Results 1 - 2
of 2
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Nov 2017, 4:07 am
Trust v Marcum, LLP, 132 AD3d 938, 939; Rodeo Family Enters., LLC v Matte, 99 AD3d 781, 783). [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 4:40 am
More specifically, the continuous representation doctrine “applies only where there is ‘a mutual understanding of the need for further representation on the specific subject matter underlying the malpractice claim’ ” (Rodeo Family Enters., LLC v Matte, 99 AD3d at 784, quoting McCoy v Feinman, 99 NY2d 295, 306 [2002]). [read post]
