Search for: "Rodger Walker"
Results 21 - 40
of 72
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Oct 2011, 8:55 am
The minority (Lords Judge, Brown, Rodger and Walker) favoured limiting compensation to category one cases only. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 3:24 am
This unseemly row rumbled on for several weeks, until brought to an end by the untimely death of Lord Rodger of Earlsferry on 26 June. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 3:24 am
This unseemly row rumbled on for several weeks, until brought to an end by the untimely death of Lord Rodger of Earlsferry on 26 June. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 3:31 am
Following Lord Rodger’s death, and in advance of Lord Brown’s retirement next year, the Supreme Court has recently announced an appointments process for two new Supreme Court Justices. [read post]
23 May 2011, 8:44 am
In the Supreme Court the majority (Lord Phillips, Lord Hope, Lady Hale, Lord Kerr and Lord Clarke) preferred a broader construction than the minority (Lord Judge, Lord Brown, Lord Rodger and Lord Walker) would have adopted. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 11:31 pm
Second, on 6 and 7 April 2011, Lords Phillips, Rodger, Walker, Mance and Clarke will hear Jivraj v Hashwani. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 2:35 am
The appeal is due to be heard by Lords Phillips, Rodger, Walker, Mance and Clarke. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 3:29 am
On Monday 28 March, Peter Stewart v The Queen will be heard by Lord Rodger, Lady Hale, Lords Brown, Kerr and Dyson. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 3:43 am
Lords Phillips and Brown (with whom Lord Rodger agrees) dissent and hold that because the appellants would have been lawfully detained the Secretary of State is not liable to them in false imprisonment: [319]-[334], [343]-[360]. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 3:29 am
By a majority (Lords Hope, Walker and Lady Hale dissenting), the court held that the fact that the appellants would have been lawfully detained was relevant to damages rather than to liability. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 5:31 am
On Monday 21 and Tuesday 22 March, Lords Hope, Rodger, Brown, Kerr and Dyson will hear the devoluation appeal of Fraser v Her Majesty’s Advocate. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 12:29 pm
From Monday 7 to Wednesday 9 March 2011, Lords Phillips and Walker, Lady Hale, and Lords Mance and Collins will hear Lucasfilm Limited and others v Ainsworth and another. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 5:45 pm
In Courtroom 1, Lords Hope, Rodger, Walker, Collins, Kerr, Clarke and Dyson will hear Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs v Tower MCashback LLP 1 from Monday 21 to Tuesday 22 February 2011. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 10:19 am
It will be heard on Monday 7 and Tuesday 8 February 2011 by Lords Phillips, Rodger and Walker, Lady Hale and Lords Brown, Mance and Clarke. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 8:53 am
Baroness Hale (with whom Lords Hope and Walker agreed) gave the leading judgment; Lord Rodger gave a concurring judgment, out of deference to the CA; and Lord Brown doubted the result but, in the oddest final paragraph, basically said that he didn’t care enough to dissent (“At the end of the day, however, I do not feel sufficiently strongly as to the proper outcome of the appeal to carry these doubts to the point of dissent. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 2:04 am
The hearing commenced on Wednesday 8 December before Lords Hope, Rodger, Walker and Brown and Sir [...] [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 8:34 am
Two appeals are listed in the Supreme Court this week with R v F and R v M being heard by Lords Hope, Rodger and Walker, Lady Hale and Lord Brown on Monday 6 December. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 2:04 am
The panel consisted of Lords Phillips, Rodger, Walker and Brown and Sir John Dyson. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 11:07 am
Lords Hope, Rodger and Walker, Lady Hale and Lord Brown will consider whether the condition attached to claiming a state pension credit, of the right of [...] [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 12:21 am
The panel consisted of Lords Phillips, Rodger, Walker and Brown and Sir John Dyson. [read post]
