Search for: "Rodgers v. Rodgers" Results 301 - 320 of 474
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Mar 2009, 6:09 pm
The view of Lord Walker (with which Lords Rodger and Neuberger agreed) was that assurance on which a proprietary estoppel is based only needs to be “clear enough”. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 7:54 pm by Jonathan Hafetz
Raymond Randolph or Janice Rodgers Brown to further eviscerate Boumediene v. [read post]
Boersema, Lucas ReijndersWater ResourcesIntroduction to water resources and environmental issues / Karrie Lynn Pennington, Thomas V. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 10:27 am by Austin Williams
  Upon agreement by all parties, Judge Nelson ordered Brady v. [read post]
5 May 2021, 2:53 am by Graham Green and Jonathan Lord
Rodgers v Leeds Laser Cutting Limited ET/1803829/2020 Case Facts This case considered the availability and legitimacy of fears over exposure to/contracting COVID-19 at work acting as grounds for statutory protection against unfair dismissal. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 1:01 am by Matthew Flinn
This principle was applied to the press in R v Crook (1991) 93 Cr App R (2) 37 in the Court of Appeal. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 9:47 pm by Matthew Hill
” [Guardian, [72] per Lord Rodger] He also referred to two post-Guardian cases in which Northern Irish courts had considered anonymity claims in medical matters. [read post]
21 May 2012, 7:50 am by Rosalind English
In L , Lord Rodger of Earlsferry referred, at paragraph 65, to the position of a prisoner who is “incapable of looking after his own interests . . . he certainly cannot take proceedings by himself on the basis of any recollection he may have. [read post]
25 Jan 2009, 6:30 am
Co., 813 F.2d 917, 919-921 (9th Cir. 1987)(complaint constructively filed upon delivery to clerk despite rejection for non-compliance with local rules and filing fee statute); Rodgers v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 6:53 am by Tom Crane
Mental Health Ass’n. of Southeastern Pennsylvania, 168 F.3d 661, 671 (3d Cir. 1999) (“unpaid leave supplementing regular sick and personal days might, under other facts, represent a reasonable accommodation,” but leave requested here was not reasonable); Rodgers v. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 6:11 pm
Their Lordships (Lord Hope of Craighead, Lord Rodger of Earlsferry, Lord Walker of Gestingthorpe, Lord Mance and Lord Neuberger of Abbotsbury) unanimously agreed that all three questions could be answered "yes", thereby dismissing the appeal. [read post]