Search for: "Rodgers v. State" Results 201 - 220 of 329
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Sep 2011, 10:27 am by Austin Williams
  Upon agreement by all parties, Judge Nelson ordered Brady v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 1:18 am by Alasdair Henderson
Third, where the use of force by a State’s agents operating outside its territory bring an individual under the control of the State’s authorities, and thereby into its jurisdiction (the examples given here involve Issa v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 10:37 am by Legal Beagle
”However, it should be noted Lord McCluskey’s initial report clearly states : “We do not suggest that the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court should be ended. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 9:20 am by Melina Padron
AM v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 710 (21 June 2011) ?? [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 1:40 pm by WIMS
"       On February 23, 2011, in response to Federal court orders in Sierra Club v. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 11:30 pm by Matthew Hill
The families argued that Re McKerr had been rendered obsolete by the recent Strasbourg decision of Šilih v Slovenia (2009) 49 E.H.R.R. 37. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 8:01 am by Steve Hall
  The case echoes the dispute involved in the 2008 Supreme Court decision in Medellin v. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 3:38 am by Mathew Purchase, Matrix.
At paragraph 134, it stated that: “It will be for the Respondent state to implement . . . appropriate general and/or individual measures to fulfil its obligations to secure the rights of the applications and other persons in their position to respect for their private life. [read post]
24 May 2011, 8:40 am by Cathyrn Hopkins, Olswang LLP
On 9 March 2011, the Supreme Court handed down its judgment in the joint appeal of Sienkiewicz v Grief (UK) Ltd; Knowsley MBC v Willmore [2011] UKSC 10. [read post]
23 May 2011, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
Famous examples are R v Director of Public Prosecutions, Ex p Kebilene [2000] 2 AC 326 , R (L) v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [2010] 1 AC 410 and Ghaidan v Godin-Mendoza [2004] UKHL 30. [read post]
23 May 2011, 8:44 am by Edward Craven, Matrix Chambers.
This was the riddle that recently occupied a nine-judge panel of the Supreme Court in R (Adams) v Secretary of State for Justice [2011] UKSC 18. [read post]