Search for: "Rodgers v. State" Results 281 - 300 of 329
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Oct 2011, 8:55 am by Oliver Gayner, Olswang
The minority (Lords Judge, Brown, Rodger and Walker) favoured limiting compensation to category one cases only. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 5:31 am by Legal Beagle
  The Clyde & Co website states their Edinburgh office has over 50 lawyers and fee earners across the core sectors of insurance, professional liability, healthcare, employment and property. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 7:19 am by Aidan O'Neill QC
In R v Lord Chancellor Ex p Witham[1998] QB 575 he noted (at 581) that “in the unwritten legal order of the British state” it is “the common law [which] continues to accord a legislative supremacy to Parliament”. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 11:21 am by John Elwood
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit upheld the FCC’s rules, and then denied rehearing en banc over the dissents of Judge Janice Rodgers Brown and then-Judge Brett Kavanaugh. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 3:50 am by Adam Wagner
Lord Rodger sought to emphasise the reasoning of Lord Phillips, stating that “ordinary crimes” are not protected by privilege. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 10:45 pm by Adam Wagner
It is unlikely, however, that judges can be relied upon to step up on this issue in light of the recent judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in Schalk and Kopf v. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 5:25 pm by INFORRM
In White v Sweden ((2008) 46 EHRR 3) the Article 8 “right to protection of reputation” was combined with the positive obligations of the state in the application. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 1:13 pm by jak4
Loren Rodgers, “Current Practices in ESOP Company Corporate Governance,” J. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 12:33 am by INFORRM
The show’s presenter stated during the broadcast that the questions had not been seen in advance by the Prime Minister or by GB News. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 3:57 am by INFORRM
  Lord Rodger said: “Article 8 and reputation 37           On behalf of the press, Mr Robertson QC did not dispute that article 8 rights fall within the scope of “the rights of others” in article 10(2). [read post]