Search for: "Rodriguez v Jacoby & Meyers, LLP"
Results 1 - 7
of 7
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jun 2015, 9:43 am
In Rodriguez v Jacoby & Meyers, LLP, a client was injured in a rear-end car accident and subsequently retained a lawyer to represent him in a case against the other driver. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 4:35 am
[FN2] Given the [*3]absence of detailed facts, the legal malpractice cause of action should have been dismissed (see Janker v Silver, Forrester & Lesser, P.C., 135 AD3d 908, 910 [2016]; Rodriguez v Jacoby & Meyers, LLP, 126 AD3d at 1185-1186; Kreamer v Town of Oxford, 96 AD3d 1128, 1128 [2012]; compare Soule v Lozada, 232 AD2d 825, 825 [1996]). [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 4:49 am
[USA] v Johnston, 145 AD3d 1240, 1240 [2016]; Matter of Barnes v Venettozzi, 135 AD3d 1250, 1251 [2016]; Rodriguez v Jacoby & Meyers, LLP, 126 AD3d 1183, 1184-1185 [2015], lv denied 25 NY3d 912 [2015]). [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 5:56 am
Fine Art Ltd. v Lacher, 115 AD3d 600, 601 [1st Dept 2014] [allegations that client was excessively billed and then threatened and coerced into paying the excessive and overinflated fees did not establish the “existence of a chronic and/or extreme pattern of legal delinquency”]; Rodriguez v Jacoby & Meyers, LLP, 2014 WL 3421053 at *5 [Sup. [read post]
10 Nov 2017, 4:25 am
These principles apply to allegations of legal malpractice (see Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d at 87-88; New York State Workers’ Compensation Bd. v Program Risk Mgt., Inc., 150 AD3d 1589, 1594 [2017]; Rodriguez v Jacoby & Meyers, LLP, 126 AD3d 1183, 1185 [2015], lv denied 25 NY3d 912 [2015]; Snyder v Brown Chiari, LLP, 116 AD3d 1116, 1117 [2014]; Alaimo v McGeorge, 69 AD3d… [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 4:18 am
[FN2] Given the [*3]absence of detailed facts, the legal malpractice cause of action should have been dismissed (see Janker v Silver, Forrester & Lesser, P.C., 135 AD3d 908, 910 [2016]; Rodriguez v Jacoby & Meyers, LLP, 126 AD3d at 1185-1186; Kreamer v Town of Oxford, 96 AD3d 1128, 1128 [2012]; compare Soule v Lozada, 232 AD2d 825, 825 [1996]). [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 5:00 am
(Rodriguez v Jacoby & Meyers, LLP, 126 AD3d 1183, 1185–86, [3d Dept 2015].) [read post]
