Search for: "Rodriguez v. Cruz"
Results 1 - 20
of 26
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jul 2012, 9:32 am
Our conclusion that the contested statements were nontestimonial under Davis compels us to reject the challenges levied by Rodriguez and Cruz under Bruton v. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 6:00 am
Rodriguez-Franco, 749 F.2d 1555, 1559 (11th Cir. 1985); Rajah v. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 11:16 am
Rodriguez, 426 Mass. 647, 648 (1998). [read post]
2 Sep 2012, 10:18 am
Sanchez-Rodriguez, 161 F.3d 556, 564 (9th Cir. 1998) (en banc). [read post]
29 Sep 2009, 4:05 pm
Rodriguez-Preciado, 399 F.3d 1118, 1128-29(9th Cir. 2005); see also Wyrick v. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 7:16 am
He wrote that the case should at least be held pending the court’s decision in Cruz v. [read post]
16 Jan 2021, 6:41 am
La jueza presidenta del Tribunal Supremo de Puerto Rico (TSPR), Maite Oronoz Rodríguez, explicó en su opinión del caso Conde Cruz v. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 7:10 pm
" The case is Hispanics United of Buffalo v. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 9:53 am
"
Cruz v. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 5:00 am
Under Rodriguez Morales v. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 11:53 am
M-02 Cruz-Mendez . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 6:20 am
., III as Primary Sponsor Moriarty, Paul D. as Primary Sponsor Egan, Joseph V. as Co-Sponsor Diegnan, Patrick J., Jr. as Co-Sponsor Vas, Joseph as Co-Sponsor 1/15/2009 Introduced, Referred to Assembly Labor Committee 1/26/2009 Reported out of Assembly Committee, 2nd Reading 5/21/2009 Passed by the Assembly (76-0-0) 5/21/2009 Received in the Senate without Reference, 2nd Reading Statement - ALA 1/26/09 - 1 pages PDF Format HTML Format Introduced - 3 pages PDF Format HTML Format Committee… [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 6:47 am
United States, 16-8675, and Rodriguez v. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 3:16 pm
Attorney Roger Cruz. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 3:16 pm
Attorney Roger Cruz. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 6:07 pm
Allen v. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 7:00 am
In Brown v. [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 2:57 pm
Cruz-Diaz, No. 07-1534, 07-1535 Armed bank-robbery convictions are affirmed, despite one bank teller's doubt as to whether the gun was real, where eyewitness testimony, the bank's surveillance video, and the discovery of a bullet casing in the getaway car were all consistent with the finding that the gun was real. [read post]
24 May 2010, 9:10 pm
” Counsel for petitioner are Rob Owen (Owen & Roundtree), as well as Skadden Aarps’ attorneys Douglas G Robinson & Maria Cruz Melendez. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 8:07 am
¿Cree que debe existir derecho a representación gratuita y accesible en casos civiles (Gideon v. [read post]
