Search for: "Rodriguez v. Department of Revenue" Results 1 - 20 of 25
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Nov 2012, 8:03 am by Joel R. Brandes
Their monthly support check from the church was deposited in a joint checking account at the Mountain West Bank in Kalispell, Montana, and both Sieler and Rodriguez paid taxes to the IRS and the Montana Department of Revenue. [read post]
19 May 2008, 7:09 am
The final vote was 7-2 in Kentucky Department of Revenue v. [read post]
31 Jan 2020, 3:36 am by Edith Roberts
Montana Department of Revenue to invalidate a tax-credit program benefiting families who send their children to private schools, including religious schools, contending that “to strike down part of a state constitution because of this history raises disturbing questions. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 8:06 am by Mark J. Rose, Esq.
Ferrer, United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, John V. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 12:32 pm by Michael Madison
Professionals who are looking to get closer to the legal department without joining it. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 5:31 am by Rich Vetstein
Forms are available from the Department of Revenue (DOR) to allow homeowners to claim up to $6,000 in tax credits for septic upgrades. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 5:53 am by Dan Carvajal
Raising revenues is a legitimate purpose for government action, and the enactment of this provision is rationally related to it. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 3:24 pm by John Elwood
(relisted after the June 20 conference)   Rodriguez v. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 7:54 am by Amy Howe
Montana Department of Revenue is a clash over a Montana law that created tax credits to provide scholarships for families who send their children to private schools, including religious schools. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 7:31 am by Michael Geist
This is a clear policy choice from Canadian Heritage Minister Pablo Rodriguez, since the QCJO approach could have been used as the standard. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 2:36 pm
" Another Justice joined in the judgment, opining that revenue which a gambling business uses to pay essential operating expenses is not "proceeds" under the statute. . [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 11:34 am
Rodriguez-Amaya, No. 06-4514 Conviction for unlawful reentry after deportation by an aggravated felon is affirmed where the time defendant was detained by United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement on administrative charges pending his removal was not detention "in connection with" his arrest, thus defendant's indictment did not violate the Speedy Trial Act. [read post]