Search for: "Rodriguez v. Immigration Customs Enforcement" Results 1 - 20 of 26
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Most recently, in 2013, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals held in the ACLU class action Rodriguez v. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 10:19 am by William Hibbitts | JURIST Staff
The first case concerned Antonio Arteaga-Martinez, an immigrant from Mexico who was detained by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) in 2018 for entering the US illegally six years prior. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 11:05 am by Jessica Zhang
Background On June 11, 2017, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents began arresting and detaining Iraqi nationals in the metro Detroit area. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 8:30 am
Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) in Orange County, California, as he was driving his son to daycare. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 11:42 am by Jessica Bansal
Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agency was on full display this past year. [read post]
29 May 2019, 6:01 am by Andrew Patterson
This change is set to take effect on July 15, after which time Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) will have sole authority to determine whether these asylum seekers are detained or released. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 7:48 am by Peter Margulies
U.S. employers benefit from weak enforcement of the employer sanctions provisions of the Immigration and Nationality Act, which on paper bar employment of undocumented immigrants. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 4:21 am by Edith Roberts
Rodriguez, a challenge to the prolonged detention of immigrants without bond hearings. [read post]
23 May 2019, 7:12 am by John Elwood
Rodriguez, 18-309, involve questions of liability for American law-enforcement officers who allegedly wrongfully shoot across the U.S. [read post]
4 Oct 2008, 9:00 am
Mukasey    Board of Immigration Appeals 08a0591n.06 Larry Kellum v. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 2:36 pm
Davis, No. 07-10177 An Anders motion to withdraw as counsel by defendant's federal public defender is denied without prejudice where: 1) counsel's Acquaye statement did not indicate that he had consulted with the United States Attorney's Office (USAO) as to defendant's case; 2) there was no indication that the USAO will enforce the appellate waiver; and 3) counsel could not simply rely on the USAO's statement that they will enforce the appeal waiver in all… [read post]