Search for: "Rodriguez v. United States"
Results 581 - 600
of 1,078
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2017, 1:10 pm
United States, No. 16-142, argued March 29. [read post]
15 Feb 2007, 12:25 am
United States, 649 A.2d 301, 308 (D.C. 1994); Carson v. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 10:37 am
In arguing for reversal, the United States relies on Demore v. [read post]
19 Dec 2007, 3:05 pm
Rodriguez, 60 M.J. 87 (C.A.A.F. 2004); United States v. [read post]
29 Aug 2009, 9:00 am
"In United States v. [read post]
11 Sep 2011, 5:35 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2016, 1:20 pm
United States is a technical question about restitution. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 3:35 am
United States. [read post]
22 Feb 2007, 6:21 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 5:29 am
Does Data Scraping Violate Federal and State Law? [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 6:45 am
United States 17-5165 Issue: Whether Richardson v. [read post]
2 Aug 2007, 1:00 pm
Aug. 1, 2007) (available here):The United States appeals the sentence imposed by the district court on Defendant-Appellee Charlie Tom for the murder of his infant son. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 3:28 pm
The Court reasoned that the holding in Rodriguez de Quijas v. [read post]
11 Dec 2007, 9:19 pm
"The fugitive disentitlement doctrine permits a court to dismiss an appeal if the party seeking relief is a fugitive while the matter is pending' (Degen v United States, 517 US 820, 824 [1996]; see Ortega-Rodriguez v United States, 507 US 234, 242 [1993]). [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 6:07 am
Compare, e.g., United States v. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 4:39 pm
Meza-Rodriguez, the Seventh Circuit created a circuit split by holding that the Second Amendment, which provides that “the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed,” protects illegal aliens with “extensive ties” to the United States. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 12:27 pm
Court Rules Illegal Immigrants Have 2nd Amendment Rights: In the case of United States v. [read post]
13 Oct 2016, 4:09 am
” Coverage of the argument in Pena-Rodriguez v. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 10:32 am
Ceballos, the United States Supreme Court in 2006, held that public employee speech made pursuant to “official duties” does not have First Amendment protection, and cannot form the basis for a retaliation claim. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 7:01 am
, Practical Global Tort Litigation: United States, Germany, and Argentina (2007). [read post]