Search for: "Rodriquez v. State"
Results 61 - 80
of 136
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Feb 2014, 9:33 am
Beckon * Employee Blogging Risks * Employee Terminated for Facebook Message Fails to State Public Policy Claim — Barnett v. [read post]
2 Feb 2014, 10:37 am
Beckon * Employee Blogging Risks * Employee Terminated for Facebook Message Fails to State Public Policy Claim — Barnett v. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 8:15 am
United States v. [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 5:30 am
Becomes Canada’s Longest-Serving Chief Justice http://t.co/WxpKIS9o3n -> Life on the Social Media Front Line: The legal and ethical challenges facing Online Community Managers http://t.co/YD8WpEJJZj -> eBay Not Liable for Technical Glitch When Seller Doesn't Set Reserve Price — D'Agostino v. eBay http://t.co/2epESgQmu0 -> Court Upholds Doocing For Snarky Facebook Post — Rodriquez v. [read post]
21 Sep 2013, 11:04 am
[Post by Venkat Balasubramani] Rodriquez v. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 8:43 pm
In Rodriguez v. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 2:51 pm
Compare, for example, United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 1:51 pm
Compare, for example, United States v. [read post]
16 May 2013, 8:59 am
Also under HITECH, the provider will only have 30 days to respond to the person’s request v. the current 60 days under HIPAA. [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 11:44 am
In United States v. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 2:50 pm
Rodriquez v. [read post]
10 Oct 2012, 8:44 pm
Note: just before the Supreme Court denied the petition for certiorari, in McReynolds, the 5th Circuit issued its decision in Rodriquez v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 10:17 pm
Join us back here tomorrow for a preview of the argument in Rodriquez v. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 6:50 am
See Rodriquez v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 11:49 am
McMahon, 482 U.S. 222 (1987) (Exchange Act claims); Rodriquez de Quijas v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 11:49 am
McMahon, 482 U.S. 222 (1987) (Exchange Act claims); Rodriquez de Quijas v. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 1:57 pm
O'Meara and Rodriquez v. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 1:57 pm
O'Meara and Rodriquez v. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 1:57 pm
O'Meara and Rodriquez v. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 9:29 am
"Our side" considered it a loss (I was lobbying for the Innocence Project of Texas on the subject), but the law simply did not give criminal defendants the means to keep eyewitness testimony out of evidence if lineups don't follow written policies, nor if written policies are inadequate.Ironically, though Chief Rodriguez wants to blame the Legislature for his woes, the much more significant penalty for failing to follow best practices was laid down in October by the Texas Court of… [read post]
