Search for: "Rodriquez v. Williams"
Results 1 - 20
of 24
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 May 2008, 6:37 pm
US v. [read post]
19 May 2008, 7:32 am
Continuing its somewhat puzzling approach (and voting paterns) in ACCA cases, the Supreme Court today in United States v. [read post]
19 May 2008, 7:14 am
Rodriquez (06-1646) is now available here. [read post]
19 May 2008, 8:11 am
Rodriquez, No. 06-1646, at this link, while the oral argument transcript can be accessed here. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 1:16 pm
” Williams v. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 12:47 am
Per UNITED STATES v. [read post]
19 May 2008, 8:14 am
Williams is available here. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 12:40 pm
In 2011, Leonel Contreras and William Rodriquez, both 16 years old, kidnapped and violently sexually assaulted two teenage girls. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 12:05 pm
This entry was written by Philip Gordon and William Simmons. [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 5:45 am
The Williams court cites United States v. [read post]
19 May 2008, 1:51 pm
CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE, SENTENCING US v. [read post]
6 Apr 2022, 5:00 am
The insurance company attempted to cite to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court Opinion in Williams v. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 6:09 pm
Before discussing whether reasonable suspicion existed, the court recognized that Rodriquez overturned prior rulings of lower appellate courts, including North Carolina’s (see State v. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 6:09 pm
Before discussing whether reasonable suspicion existed, the court recognized that Rodriquez overturned prior rulings of lower appellate courts, including North Carolina’s (see State v. [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 7:10 am
RODRIQUEZ, GINO G. | Questions Presented 06-11543 BEGAY, LARRY V. [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 3:16 am
RODRIQUEZ, GINO G.The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 6:50 am
See Rodriquez v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 11:23 am
Supreme Court in Penry v. [read post]
8 Apr 2009, 4:36 pm
Rodriquez 125 days 6-3 2; Alito(m), Souter(d) Gonzalez v. [read post]
2 Feb 2009, 3:39 am
Supreme Court case construing the act, Sosa v. [read post]
