Search for: "Roger Alford"
Results 121 - 140
of 365
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Oct 2011, 12:31 am
” In an opinion by Judge Cole, joined by Judges Rogers and Griffin, the court held that that “where there is clear evidence that the officers were not engaged in bona fide law enforcement activities, but instead acted with a corrupt, personal, and pecuniary interest, the officers violate the civil rights of those that are stopped, searched, or have their property seized. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 6:00 am
by Roger Alford On Monday, October 24, I’ll be participating in a panel discussion at NYU on the The Implications of Chevron v. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 8:12 am
by Roger Alford The United States has finally decided to seize Michael Jackson’s glove. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 8:15 am
by Roger Alford Last week I wrote that the Supreme Court’s docket of international law cases was thin, thin, thin. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 10:04 am
by Roger Alford Jeremy Waldron continues to do incredibly interesting philosophical work on questions surrounding torture. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 7:53 pm
Alford, Ph.D. and Peter C. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 7:03 am
(Kenneth Anderson) Roger Alford at Opinio Juris observes the paucity of cases involving international law issues in the new Supreme Court term, speaking of First Monday. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 9:28 am
by Roger Alford Luke Peterson passed along a tip about this interesting declaration attached to the U.S. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 10:21 am
Related posts:Antisuit Injunctions My colleague Roger Alford has an excellent post up at... [read post]
3 Sep 2011, 8:13 am
by Roger Alford “We deplore the decision of WikiLeaks to publish the unredacted state department cables, which may put sources at risk. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 9:35 am
However, I agree with John that the tone of the 11th Circuit opinion reflects something that Roger Alford has mentioned at Opinio Juris blog — a note of caution entering appellate decisions in ATS cases.First, the Court shows considerable sensitivity (if not irritation) about being asked to judge security actions taken by foreign leaders, especially in this case where the leaders were “faced with thousands of people taking to the streets in opposition. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 10:36 am
by Roger Alford “People of Libya! [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 9:54 am
(An Alford plea is a guilty plea, where the defendant does not admit the act or assert innocence, but admits that sufficient evidence exists with which the prosecution could likely convince a judge or jury to find the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.) [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 9:04 am
by Roger Alford Professor Cecilia Marcela Bailliet of the University of Oslo has a very useful post over at IntLawGrrls on possible criminal punishment for right-wing extremist Anders Behring Breivik. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 7:42 pm
Asserting Personal Jurisdiction in Human Rights Cases My colleague Roger Alford has a fascinating post over at... [read post]
International Law in the U.S. Supreme Court: A Response to Professors Anderson, Rabkin, and Martinez
27 Jul 2011, 2:24 pm
We are very grateful to Roger Alford, Ken Anderson, Harlan Cohen, Andrew Kent, Jenny Martinez, and Ingrid Wuerth for the keenness of their insights, the generosity of their praise, and the gentleness of their criticisms. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 7:45 pm
Dodge The joy of this project was making the kind of discovery Roger Alford recounts in his post. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 9:49 am
by Roger Alford When Bill Dodge, Michael Ramsey and David Sloss approached me to write a chapter for their forthcoming book, I told them that I would be interested in doing so as long as I did not have to rehash the tired contemporary debate about constitutional comparativism. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 9:40 am
To be sure, these issues and others like them are mentioned at places throughout the book – Roger Alford, Ralf Michael, and Paul Stephan’s contributions come to mind in particular. [read post]
23 Jul 2011, 10:56 am
In the interest of disclosure, I would note that two Opinio Juris regulars participated in the volume: I authored the second chapter on how the Supreme Court dealt with treaties between 1861-1900 while Roger Alford authored the eighth chapter on international law as an interpretative tool in the Court during the 1901-1945 time frame. [read post]
