Search for: "Rogers v State"
Results 1 - 20
of 3,498
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 May 2024, 1:21 pm
" Rogers v. [read post]
1 May 2024, 11:04 am
Wanda Little Fenimore, The Rhetorical Road to Brown v. [read post]
1 May 2024, 12:15 am
Rogers, 206 Cal. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 12:52 am
t=Cariou%20v.%20Prince Rogers v. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 11:33 am
A few months after the Oregon hearings, Judge Weinstein, in the fall of 1996, along with other federal and state judges, held a “Daubert” hearing on the admissibility of expert witness opinion testimony in breast implant cases, pending in New York state and federal courts. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 10:01 am
The motion cataloged Trump’s long history of verbally attacking people involved in legal proceedings against him and his allies, offering examples from this case, the D.C. federal criminal prosecution, the Georgia state prosecution, the NY civil fraud case, and the prosecution of Roger Stone. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 8:04 am
Rogers, 281 U. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am
In December 1996, Judge Jones issued his decision that excluded the plaintiffs’ expert witnesses’ proposed testimony on grounds that it failed to satisfy the requirements of Rule 702.[5] In October 1996, while Judge Jones was studying the record, and writing his opinion in the Hall case, Judge Weinstein, with a judge from the Southern District of New York, and another from New York state trial court, conducted a two-week Rule 702 hearing, in Brooklyn. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 7:01 pm
State Rifle & Pistol Ass'n v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 5:00 am
For instance, the 2017 case A.B v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 1:11 am
Given his decision to refuse a faculty to remove all of the pews, the Chancellor stated that the Petitioners may wish to re-think their proposals in respect of the heating. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 5:01 am
From Friday's California Court of Appeal decision in Norway v. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 5:57 am
1981 – Dudgeon v. the United Kingdom In 1967, homosexuality was in part decriminalised in England and Wales.[2] In 1980, it would be decriminalised under the same conditions in Scotland, and in 1982, in Northern Ireland as well. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 3:40 pm
From Judge Roger Benitez's decision in Fouts v. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:43 pm
But if Rogers survives, that’s what it does. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am
Justice Scalia was exactly right about this—and for that matter, so was Chief Justice Marshall, who clarified this very point in his circuit opinion in United States v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 12:13 pm
Then, in Lexmark v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 2:25 pm
Pearson v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 7:47 pm
A Short Response to Roger Parloff and Others (1/24/24). [read post]
