Search for: "Rogers v. BNSF Railway Company"
Results 1 - 11
of 11
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Oct 2022, 11:19 am
In Richard Rogers v. [read post]
18 Jan 2023, 10:00 pm
BNSF Railway Company (Judgment) [read post]
16 Nov 2022, 1:14 pm
BNSF Railway Company. [read post]
18 Nov 2022, 8:44 am
BNSF Railway Company[2] was the first fully litigated case against an employer for violating BIPA, in the wake of massive settlements involving tech companies including Facebook ($650 million)[3], Google ($100 million)[4], TikTok ($92 million)[5], and Snapchat ($35 million).[6] Meanwhile, the Illinois Supreme Court in West Bend Mutual Insurance Co. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 12:51 pm
BNSF Railway Company (Easement Agreement)Scudero v. [read post]
16 Nov 2022, 4:00 am
BNSF Railway Company (Case No. 19-C-3083, N.D. [read post]
3 Jan 2015, 3:47 pm
Brown v. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 10:51 am
Martinez’s father filed suit, individually and on behalf of his son’s estate, against Oak Bend and BNSF Railway Company, which owned and operated the train that struck Martinez. [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 1:57 pm
BNSF Railway Company (Easement Agreement)Scudero v. [read post]
7 Mar 2019, 4:12 am
NRDC, the case prescribing deference to a reasonable agency interpretation of an ambiguous statute, in Monday’s BNSF Railway Company v. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 1:15 pm
Black Horse) and the first BIPA jury verdict (Rogers v. [read post]
