Search for: "Rogers v. Correction et al"
Results 1 - 20
of 68
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Apr 2024, 11:33 am
To give the reader some idea of the artificial flavor of Egilman’s pomposity, paragraph 8 of his remarkable declaration avers” “My views on the scientific standards for the determination of cause-effect relationships (medical epistemology) have been cited by the Massachusetts Supreme Court (Vassallo v. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On January 18, Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar filed an amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
31 Dec 2023, 4:29 pm
Goldsmith et al. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm
was of course correct on this limited point, but generally in this field, peer review is worth a warm bucket of spit. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 6:06 am
” (See Prosecutor v Karadzić (Decision) 16 May 1995 (ICTY Trial Chamber) paras 23-24.) [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 2:47 pm
art. 105 al. 2 LTF). [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 11:35 am
Just as I paid no attention to a variety of other cases that were launched in hopes of eventually getting a cert. grant, such as Rogers v. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 7:13 am
For example, he raises and explains the problem encountered for causal inference by small relative risks: “Small relative risks of the order of 2:1 or even less are what are likely to be observed, like the risk now recorded for childhood leukemia and exposure to magnetic fields of 0.4 µT or more (Ahlbom et al. 2000) that are seldom encountered in the United Kingdom. [read post]
29 Nov 2021, 2:00 am
Ashad Umrani, et al. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 8:21 am
Professor of Law & Director of Clinical Legal Education, UC Davis School of Law--Robert Cover as Critical Race Theorist Mark Graber, University System of Maryland Regents Professor, University of Maryland Carey School of Law & Sandford V. [read post]
30 Jun 2021, 2:00 am
The post <em>Wilson et al. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 2:46 pm
On the legal side, there was no U.S. version of the 1997 Law Commission recommendation presuming the correctness of computer output, but there was the increasing problem of law-enforcement privilege. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 2:46 pm
On the legal side, there was no U.S. version of the 1997 Law Commission recommendation presuming the correctness of computer output, but there was the increasing problem of law-enforcement privilege. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 8:00 am
Alexius Medical Center, et al., 2020 IL App (1st) 181887, Aug. 28, 2020. [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 10:08 am
JACK DRESNER, ET AL., Appellees. 3rd District. [read post]
30 May 2020, 5:29 am
Supreme Court Bulletin http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/sct/2019-2020update.htmlPetition for certiorari was filed in one case on 5/14/20:Rogers County Board of Tax Roll Corrections, et al. v. [read post]
28 May 2020, 12:19 pm
Supreme Court Bulletin http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/sct/2019-2020update.html Petition for certiorari was filed in one case on 5/14/20:Rogers County Board of Tax Roll Corrections, et al. v. [read post]
Thoughts on the SG’s “Lesbian Comparator” Argument in the Pending Title VII Sexual-Orientation Cases
6 Sep 2019, 5:08 am
Clayton County, Georgia, No. 17-1618, and Altitude Express, Inc. v. [read post]
5 May 2019, 4:41 pm
Decrypt reports that Roger Ver, the CEO of Bitcoin.com, was served with a lawsuit today by Craig Wright for calling him a fraud and a liar in a YouTube video—which has since been removed by YouTube. [read post]
4 Jan 2019, 8:23 am
Facts: This case (Rogers v. [read post]
