Search for: "Rogers v. Holder"
Results 61 - 80
of 275
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Oct 2020, 11:20 am
The Ninth Circuit therefore remanded the matter to the district court to apply the Rogers test, which requires the mark holder to show the putative infringer’s use of the mark either (1) is “not artistically relevant to the underlying work” or (2) “explicitly misleads consumers as to the sources or content of the work. [read post]
22 May 2014, 11:25 am
Holder, Judge Gonzales Rogers required ICE to give bond hearings to people picked up by ICE in their communities throughout the state of California. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 6:34 pm
Lau and Rogers v. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 9:21 am
Seuss Enterprises, L.P. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 2:03 pm
The greatest potential benefit: convince courts to think more in terms of Rogers v. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 8:20 am
She spends several pages – more than a third of the entire opinion – discussing the 1989 ruling in Rogers v. [read post]
7 Jul 2016, 6:54 am
The “Rogers” Test The Second Circuit addressed the intersection of false endorsement claims and free expression rights in Rogers v. [read post]
7 Jul 2016, 6:54 am
The “Rogers” Test The Second Circuit addressed the intersection of false endorsement claims and free expression rights in Rogers v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 4:32 pm
Rogers v. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 10:47 am
Rogers v. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 10:47 am
Rogers v. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 2:56 pm
Wozencraft, 15 F.3d 432 (5th Cir. 1994) (use of undercover police officer’s identity in film protected by First Amendment); Rogers v. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 1:26 pm
Vans again responded that Rogers v. [read post]
In no mood for charity: Federal Court confirms that charities are not necessarily public authorities
18 Aug 2016, 5:00 am
The Federal Court of Canada recently confirmed in Starbucks (HK) Limited v. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 8:19 am
Virag, SRL v. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 12:15 pm
Holder. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 3:00 am
H/T to Alison Frankel for the pointer to the oral arguments in Linde v. [read post]
13 Sep 2009, 12:55 am
A previous order had been approved against Google back in May, which identified the two ISPs as the holders of the information. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 9:15 am
Finley, which challenged political content restriction on NEA funding; and Holder v. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 4:33 pm
Padayachi v. [read post]
