Search for: "Rogers v. Jones" Results 161 - 180 of 271
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jan 2010, 10:11 am by Chuck Ramsay
Baker, Stephen Johnson, Dennis Price, John Bartolomei, Luis Jones, Robert Price, Tom Bartscher, Joy Kaess, Ryan Rainville, Peter … [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 7:39 am by Patricia Salkin
Here, because the Ethertons sued the government entity involved, the City of Rainsville, and have petitioned for monetary damages rather than injunctive relief, the court found that any official capacity claims asserted against Defendants Nick Jones, Brandon Freeman, Melissa Ledbetter, Roger Lingerfelt, Joseph Graham, David Holt, and Richard Gibson, were redundant and unnecessary. [read post]
13 Dec 2006, 7:17 pm
Grote, Josh Grubman, John Gruender, Barbara Grunwald, Gary Grunwald, Leslie Guerrero, Jay Guilaran, Roger L Gulbranson, Robert L Gunn, Charles A. [read post]
30 May 2012, 8:21 am by Guest Blogger
It has been nearly 40 years since the Court in Bob Jones University v. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 11:30 am
New-York City-hall Recorder 6 v. (1817-1822) Rogers, Daniel (Editor). [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 7:55 am by Oliver Gayner, Olswang
   Immunity of Expert Witnesses For civil practitioners, one of the most interesting and potentially far reaching decisions of the term was Jones v Kaney [2011] UKSC 13. [read post]
24 Nov 2019, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
A Federal Court has issued a major website blocking order for GoldTV streaming websites at the request of Bell, Rogers and Groupe TVA. [read post]
2 Feb 2020, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
Last Week in the Courts On 28 to 30 January 2020 there will be a CMC in the phone hacking case of Various Claimants v MGN. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 6:05 am by Alfred Brophy
 Might be a tough project, but one that could pay real dividends.If you're thinking about case notes, I recommend a serious look at Jones v. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 9:19 am
| The IP term (thus far) of the millennium: the curious story of the adoption of "patent troll" and "internet trolling" | No pain, no gain: Plausibility in Warner-Lambert v Actavis | Testing the boundaries of subjectivity: Infringement of Swiss-type claims in Warner-Lambert v Actavis | Is SPINNING generic? [read post]