Search for: "Rogers v. Law" Results 181 - 200 of 4,029
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Feb 2008, 9:06 am
Roger Baron, University of South Dakota School of Law: The Supreme Court has conferences scheduled for this coming Friday, 2/22 and also the following Friday, 2/29. [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 8:55 am by Lawrence Solum
Rogers College of Law) has posted What Is the Matter with Dobbs? [read post]
25 Nov 2010, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
This is in line with one of the “limiting principles” in the law of breach of confidence, as stated in the Spycatcher litigation (Attorney-General v Observer Ltd [1990] 1 AC 109 HL) that the law would not protect the trivial or the anodyne. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 3:21 am
Applying these principles, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia granted the defendants' motion for summary judgment in Rogers v. [read post]
11 Dec 2007, 10:24 pm
Marin Roger Scordato (Catholic University of America - Columbus School of Law) has posted The International Legal Environment for Serious Political Reporting Has Fundamentally Changed: Understanding the Revolutionary New Era of English Defamation Law (Connecticut Law Review, Vol. 40, No. 1, 2007) on SSRN. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 2:18 pm
One of the problems with openly flouting federal drug laws is that, eventually, you may draw some interest from the federal government. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 11:17 am by Walter Olson
Tags: law schools, Supreme Court Related posts March 26 roundup (9) June 11 roundup (1) Elena Kagan and the Supreme Court as faculty meeting (6) Wyeth v. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 4:00 am by Barry Sookman
Canadian Topsires Selection Inc., 2016 BCSC 1095 https://t.co/8a9uThLg2u -> Big win for Rogers on division of powers grounds Rogers Communications Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 11:15 am
It should not surprise anyone that in People v Durand (2009 NY Slip Op 04476 4th Dept 6/5/09) the Court held that under New York law it was error for the lower court to have considered "the counts of burglary in the third degree and petit larceny, of which defendant was acquitted, when imposing the sentences on the criminal trespass counts (see People v Reeder, 298 AD2d 468, lv denied 99 NY2d 538; see also People v Rogers, 56 AD3d 1173, 1174). [read post]