Search for: "Rogers v. Secretary, Department of Corrections" Results 1 - 20 of 37
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 May 2013, 6:35 am by Howard Friedman
Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, (11 Cir., May 14, 2013), the 11th Circuit sent back for trial a Jewish prisoner's challenge under RLUIPA to Florida's refusal to provide him with kosher meals.In Watkins v. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 10:38 am by Seth Davis
Circuit, in an opinion by Judge Rogers, held that the 2022 distribution had corrected the error and thus mooted the claim. [read post]
9 May 2018, 9:57 am by Shea Denning
Bell, 270 N.C. 25 (1967) (fatal variance existed when indictment charged defendant with robbing “Jean Rogers” and the evidence at trial showed that the victim was “Susan Rogers”); State v. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal A Conspiracy of Hunches: Roger Stone trial set to start this week San Francisco Chronicle – Devlin Barrett, Spencer Hsu, and Manuel Roig-Franzia (Washington Post) | Published: 11/4/2019 Roger Stone is on trial in federal court, where prosecutors plan to dive back into an episode of political chicanery, alleged lies, and conspiratorial texts that parallels the nascent impeachment inquiry into his longtime friend President Trump. [read post]
6 May 2012, 2:29 pm by Sam Murrant
Peart v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 568 Court ignored key factors in “foreign criminal” deportation case. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 2:32 pm by John Elwood
(relisted after the Sept. 29 and Oct. 9 conferences) Rogers County Board of Tax Roll Corrections v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 1:30 pm by Tom Goldstein
Department of Interior, 538 U.S. 803 (2003). [read post]
2 Jul 2023, 8:52 am by Haley Proctor
June was a good month in court for Secretary of the Interior Debra Haaland. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 11:36 am by Robert Chesney
But when the CIA, State Department and FBI got wind of the plan to conduct operations [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 6:06 am by Albert W. Alschuler
A final section notes gaps in the admissible evidence and suggests ways in which the Justice Department might fill them. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 1:41 am by INFORRM
Warby LJ, with whom Sharp P and Singh LJ agreed, held that Steyn J had been correct in principle to reconsider the issue of serious harm in relation to the period after Ms Cadwalladr’s public interest defence fell away. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 7:55 am by Oliver Gayner, Olswang
  Correct test for homelessness under Housing Act 1996: meaning of “violence” expanded to include threats / intimidation / indirect abuse, as well as physical violence XZ (Tanzania) v SoS Home Department [2011] UKSC 4. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 9:07 am by Marty Lederman
Judge Pillard wrote the opinion; it was joined by Judges Rogers and Wilkins. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 7:42 am by Marty Lederman
  No one disputes that Article I, Section 9 would bar the Secretaries from “draw[ing]” funds from the Treasury if the Executive’s statutory interpretation turns out to be mistaken. [read post]